Data_Sheet_1_Heterogeneity Within Youth With Childhood-Onset Conduct Disorder in the ABCD Study.docx
The purpose of this study was to examine if personality traits can be used to characterize subgroups of youth diagnosed with childhood-onset conduct disorder (CD). Participants were 11,552 youth from the Adolescent Brain Cognitive Development study. Data used in this report came from doi: 10.15154/1504041 (M age 9.92; 45.3% female, 49.6% white, 19.0% Hispanic). A subset of this sample (n = 365) met criteria for CD. Latent profile analyses (LPA) were performed on this subgroup (n = 365) to define profiles of individuals with CD based on self-report measures of impulsivity, punishment sensitivity, reward response, and callous-unemotional traits. Follow up analyses determined if these groups differed on clinically relevant variables including psychopathology, environmental risk factors, social risk factors, and neurocognitive functioning. Participants with a CD diagnosis scored significantly higher on psychological, environmental, social, and neurocognitive risk factors. The LPA revealed three unique profiles, which differed significantly on liability for broad psychopathology and domain-specific liability for externalizing psychopathology but were largely matched on environmental and social risk factors. These unique configurations provide a useful way to further parse clinically relevant subgroups within youth who meet criteria for childhood-onset CD, setting the stage for prospective longitudinal research using these latent profiles to better understand the development of youth with childhood-onset CD.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0033-295X.100.4.674
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41572-019-0095-y
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0954579408000333
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jcpp.12152
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10578-015-0564-9
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01823.x
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0306624X18758897
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4899-1501-6_6
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0954579402001104
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1468-2850.2010.01224.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00101-X
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2017.04.028
- https://doi.org//10.1023/B%3AJACP.0000047208.23845.64
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0021-843X.103.2.192
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10401230701465269
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jcpp.12353
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0033076
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.books.9780890425596
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11920-006-0082-3
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1469-7610.2007.01862.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1469-7610.2009.02199.x
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15374416.2012.664815
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jopy.12119
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S003329171300161X
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10862-018-9655-9
- https://doi.org//10.1207/s15374424jccp3501
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15374416.2019.1574228
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11126-017-9506-y
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0020796
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jaac.2010.07.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0272-7358(97)00045-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2007.04.020
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2017.12.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsych.2007.06.019
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF01447476
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2014.01.054
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17470919.2012.712549
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.024
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10567-013-0159-6
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00787-011-0229-6
- https://doi.org//10.1093/scan/nsv007
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.016
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0165025419881721
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1115365109
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291714001792
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.addbeh.2015.10.010
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10705511.2013.824780
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291706007082
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291720005103
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2018.04.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2017.10.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2018.03.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.dcn.2018.02.006
- https://doi.org//10.1037/pas0000186
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291719000278
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1469-7610.1997.tb01545.x
- https://doi.org//10.1542/pir.21-8-265
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291708003115
- https://doi.org//10.1001/archgenpsychiatry.2009.55
- https://doi.org//10.1177/2167702613497473
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.ajp.2018.17121383
- https://doi.org//10.31234/osf.io/b6uy7
- https://doi.org//10.1097/00004583-200111000-00015
- https://doi.org//10.1101/657205
- https://doi.org//10.4135/9780857020994.n6
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10705511.2014.915181
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0028355
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jcpp.12300
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10862-018-9659-5
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jcpp.12738
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24184
CC BY 4.0