ctDNA-based detection of molecular residual disease in stage I-III non-small cell lung cancer patients treated with definitive radiotherapy
Sensitive and reliable biomarkers for early detection of recurrence are needed to improve post-definitive radiation risk stratification, disease management, and outcomes for patients with unresectable early-stage or locally advanced non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) who are treated with definitive radiation therapy (RT). This prospective, multistate single-center, cohort study investigated the association of circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) status with recurrence in patients with unresectable stage I-III NSCLC who underwent definitive RT.
MethodsA total of 70 serial plasma samples from 17 NSCLC patients were collected before, during, and after treatment. A personalized, tumor-informed ctDNA assay was used to track a set of up to 16 somatic, single nucleotide variants in the associated patient’s plasma samples.
ResultsPre-treatment ctDNA detection rate was 82% (14/17) and varied based on histology and stage. ctDNA was detected in 35% (6/17) of patients at the first post-RT timepoint (median of 1.66 months following the completion of RT), all of whom subsequently developed clinical progression. At this first post-RT time point, patients with ctDNA-positivity had significantly worse progression-free survival (PFS) [hazard ratio (HR): 24.2, p=0.004], and ctDNA-positivity was the only significant prognostic factor associated with PFS (HR: 13.4, p=0.02) in a multivariate analysis. All patients who developed clinical recurrence had detectable ctDNA with an average lead time over radiographic progression of 5.4 months, and post-RT ctDNA positivity was significantly associated with poor PFS (p<0.0001).
ConclusionPersonalized, longitudinal ctDNA monitoring can detect recurrence early in patients with unresectable NSCLC patients undergoing curative radiation and potentially risk-stratify patients who might benefit most from treatment intensification.
CITE THIS COLLECTION
REFERENCES
- https://doi.org//10.3390/cancers13153759
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cllc.2015.09.006
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.035
- https://doi.org//10.1200/PO.21.00181
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s43018-019-0011-0
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.0528
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.21.01308
- https://doi.org//10.1158/2159-8290.CD-17-0716
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12943-022-01590-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.annonc.2022.02.007
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature22364
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.18.02052
- https://doi.org//10.1158/2159-8290.CD-21-0%60634
SHARE
Usage metrics
