Line-Up Image Position in Simultaneous and Sequential Line-Ups: The Effects of Age and Viewing Distance on Selection Patterns
It is known that children and older adults produce more false alarms in target absent line-ups and that weaker facial encoding increases choosing bias. However, there has been no investigation of how age or facial encoding strength impacts line-up position selections in either sequential or simultaneous line-ups. In the present study, we presented participants with four live targets (one by one) while manipulating sequential and simultaneous line-ups between participants and target present and target absent line-ups within participants. In order to investigate facial encoding strength, we presented the targets at distances between 5 and 110 m. Our main hypotheses were that children due to deficits with inhibition would be more biased toward indiscriminate selections in the first position of sequential line-ups compared with subsequent line-up positions and that first position selections would increase for all age groups as facial encoding became weaker. In simultaneous line-ups, we expected to find a top row bias. In our sample (N = 1,588 participants; 6–77 years), we found that younger children (6–11 years) and the oldest adults (60–77 years) showed a first position bias in sequential line-ups, and as facial encoding became weaker, all age groups (6–11, 12–17, 18–44, 45–59, and 60–77 years) showed an increased tendency to make first position selections. We also found a weak top row preference in simultaneous line-ups, which was moderated by age and increased distance. The main finding is that the results suggest that younger children and the oldest adults had a tendency toward a first position selection bias in sequential line-ups. Based on the combined results, we recommend caution when using sequential line-ups with younger children or older adults.
CITE THIS COLLECTION
REFERENCES
- https://doi.org//10.1080/016502599383973
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1745691615588092
- https://doi.org//10.4135/9781446294703.n36
- https://doi.org//10.3758/s13421-018-0877-6
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-8624.2004.00690.x
- https://doi.org//10.1002/acp.3292
- https://doi.org//10.1002/acp.3551
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10979-005-2418-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cognition.2009.02.004
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11896-015-9176-3
- https://doi.org//10.1037/bul0000013
- https://doi.org//10.1016/BS.PLM.2015.03.003
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0278-7393.31.4.768
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0029779
SHARE
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
![Frontiers in Psychology](https://s3-eu-west-1.amazonaws.com/876az-branding-figshare/frontiers/logo.png)
AUTHORS (5)
CATEGORIES
- Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Applied Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology
- Organizational Behavioral Psychology
- Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology
- Gender Psychology
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
- Industrial and Organisational Psychology
- Psychology not elsewhere classified