Fentanyl Inhibits Air Puff-Evoked Sensory Information Processing in Mouse Cerebellar Neurons Recorded in vivo
Aim: To examine the effects of fentanyl, a potent mu-opioid receptor (MOR) agonist, on-air puff-evoked responses in Purkinje cells (PCs), and molecular layer interneurons (MLIs) using in vivo patch-clamp recordings in anesthetized mice.
Methods: Male mice 6–8 weeks-old were anesthetized and fixed on a custom-made stereotaxic frame. The cerebellar surface was exposed and perfused with oxygenated artificial cerebrospinal fluid (ACSF). Patch-clamp recordings in the cell-attached mode were obtained from PCs and MLIs. Facial stimulation by air-puff of the ipsilateral whisker pad was performed through a pressurized injection system. Fentanyl citrate, CTOP, and H-89 dissolved in ACSF were perfused onto the cerebellar surface.
Results: Fentanyl significantly inhibited the amplitude and area under the curve (AUC) of sensory stimulation-evoked inhibitory responses in PCs. Although fentanyl did not influence the frequency of simple spikes (SSs), it decreased the pause of SS. The IC50 of the fentanyl-induced suppression of the P1 response amplitude was 5.53 μM. The selective MOR antagonist CTOP abolished fentanyl-induced inhibitory responses in PCs. However, the application of CTOP alone increased the amplitude, AUC of P1, and the pause of SS. Notably, fentanyl significantly inhibited the tactile-evoked response of MLIs but did not affect their spontaneous firing. The fentanyl-induced decrease of inhibitory responses in PCs was partially prevented by a PKA inhibitor, H-89.
Conclusions: These results suggest that fentanyl binds to MORs in MLIs to reduce GABAergic neurotransmission in MLI-PC projections and one potential mechanism is via modulation of the cAMP-PKA pathway.
CITE THIS COLLECTION
REFERENCES
- https://doi.org//10.1523/JNEUROSCI.20-03-01179.2000
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuropharm.2017.10.016
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnint.2014.00045
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neubiorev.2014.12.018
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0014-2999(02)02877-7
- https://doi.org//10.1111/adb.12576
- https://doi.org//10.1523/JNEUROSCI.0204-15.2015
- https://doi.org//10.1152/jn.1983.49.3.745
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.aav0581
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF00519303
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0022752
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neulet.2010.10.018
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0037031
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.brainres.2004.02.010