Presentation_1_Nutrient-Driven O-GlcNAcylation at Promoters Impacts Genome-Wide RNA Pol II Distribution.PPTX
Nutrient-driven O-GlcNAcylation has been linked to epigenetic regulation of gene expression in metazoans. In C. elegans, O-GlcNAc marks the promoters of over 800 developmental, metabolic, and stress-related genes; these O-GlcNAc marked genes show a strong 5′, promoter-proximal bias in the distribution of RNA Polymerase II (Pol II). In response to starvation or feeding, the steady state distribution of O-GlcNAc at promoters remain nearly constant presumably due to dynamic cycling mediated by the transferase OGT-1 and the O-GlcNAcase OGA-1. However, in viable mutants lacking either of these enzymes of O-GlcNAc metabolism, the nutrient-responsive GlcNAcylation of promoters is dramatically altered. Blocked O-GlcNAc cycling leads to a striking nutrient-dependent accumulation of O-GlcNAc on RNA Pol II. O-GlcNAc cycling mutants also show an exaggerated, nutrient-responsive redistribution of promoter-proximal RNA Pol II isoforms and extensive transcriptional deregulation. Our findings suggest a complex interplay between the O-GlcNAc modification at promoters, the kinase-dependent “CTD-code,” and co-factors regulating RNA Pol II dynamics. Nutrient-responsive O-GlcNAc cycling may buffer the transcriptional apparatus from dramatic swings in nutrient availability by modulating promoter activity to meet metabolic and developmental needs.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.1477006
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nsb0903-679
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcel.2009.10.019
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.200303.112
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-genet-110711-155440
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.celrep.2017.07.021
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2007.05.042
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.1509607
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1150843
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1162228
- https://doi.org//10.1186/gb-2008-9-5-220
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrm3953
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41580-018-0010-5
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2011.04.021
- https://doi.org//10.1038/366461a0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cub.2006.03.021
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.1701508
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1178343
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1169628
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.celrep.2014.01.008
- https://doi.org//10.7554/eLife.00808
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0408771102
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0601931103
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.semcdb.2010.05.001
- https://doi.org//10.1096/fasebj.6.6.1312045
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbagen.2009.07.018
- https://doi.org//10.1126/stke.3122005re13
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0806216105
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1169727
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0904638106
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0911857107
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M115.704783
- https://doi.org//10.1021/bi0027480
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.biochem.5b01280
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M111.330910
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.R114.595439
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M115.684365
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M116.751420
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.100471497
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0003-9861(02)00578-7
- https://doi.org//10.1128/MCB.24.4.1680-1690.2004
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M114.617779
- https://doi.org//10.1534/genetics.111.126490
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0015898
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1000848
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1000187
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0006700
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0812894106
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0304-4165(99)00176-2
- https://doi.org//10.1021/ja038545r
- https://doi.org//10.1002/1521-3773(20010601)40:11<2004::AID-ANIE2004>3.0.CO;2-5
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.2016011
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.836300
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nsmb.1913
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.13.2.202
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2164-15-321
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.biochem.66.1.315
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biocel.2004.12.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0092-8674(02)00810-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.gde.2006.08.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cub.2004.08.062
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11892-007-0047-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nut.2005.09.006
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.ejhg.5201538
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.104.5.1143
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkn923
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nprot.2008.211