Presentation_1_Multiframe Evolving Dynamic Functional Connectivity (EVOdFNC): A Method for Constructing and Investigating Functional Brain Motifs.pdf
The study of brain network connectivity as a time-varying property began relatively recently and, to date, has remained primarily concerned with capturing a handful of discrete static states that characterize connectivity as measured on a timescale shorter than that of the full scan. Capturing group-level representations of temporally evolving patterns of connectivity is a challenging and important next step in fully leveraging the information available in large resting state functional magnetic resonance imaging (rs-fMRI) studies. We introduce a flexible, extensible data-driven framework for the stable identification of group-level multiframe (movie-style) dynamic functional network connectivity (dFNC) states. Our approach employs uniform manifold approximation and embedding (UMAP) to produce a continuity-preserving planar embedding of high-dimensional time-varying measurements of whole-brain functional network connectivity. Planar linear exemplars summarizing dominant dynamic trends across the population are computed from local linear approximations to the two-dimensional 2D embedded trajectories. A high-dimensional representation of each 2D exemplar segment is obtained by averaging the dFNC observations corresponding to the n planar nearest neighbors of τ evenly spaced points along the 2D line segment representation (where n is the UMAP number-of-neighbors parameter and τ is the temporal duration of trajectory segments being approximated). Each of the 2D exemplars thus “lifts” to a multiframe high-dimensional dFNC trajectory of length τ. The collection of high-dimensional temporally evolving dFNC representations (EVOdFNCs) derived in this manner are employed as dynamic basis objects with which to characterize observed high-dimensional dFNC trajectories, which are then expressed as weighted combination of these basis objects. Our approach yields new insights into anomalous patterns of fluidly varying whole-brain connectivity that are significantly associated with schizophrenia as a broad diagnosis as well as with certain symptoms of this serious disorder. Importantly, we show that relative to conventional hidden Markov modeling with single-frame unvarying dFNC summary states, EVOdFNCs are more sensitive to positive symptoms of schizophrenia including hallucinations and delusions, suggesting that a more dynamic characterization is needed to help illuminate such a complex brain disorder.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.020
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2017.00624
- https://doi.org//10.1089/brain.2020.0768
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bpsc.2017.09.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuron.2014.10.015
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nicl.2014.07.003
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1352458519837707
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24721
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nicl.2017.12.013
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nicl.2019.101970
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2019.00634
- https://doi.org//10.1162/netn_a_00155
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.23896
- https://doi.org//10.1093/brain/awz192
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24591
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2020.117385
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2019.116129
- https://doi.org//10.1162/netn_a_00041
- https://doi.org//10.1089/brain.2018.0629
- https://doi.org//10.1089/brain.2017.0543
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.06.029
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10548-018-0678-z
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41587-020-00809-z
- https://doi.org//10.1093/cercor/bhw265
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.25285
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.079
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.09.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0920-9964(94)00041-6
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2019/9027803
- https://doi.org//10.1162/netn_a_00116
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.23346
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24529
- https://doi.org//10.1089/brain.2018.0579
- https://doi.org//10.1093/schbul/sbz052
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2018.00551
- https://doi.org//10.1109/TBME.2016.2600637
- https://doi.org//10.1109/LSP.2016.2585182
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0149849
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10548-014-0406-2
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.04.049
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.061
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24064
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2018.10.004
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnhum.2014.00897
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2021.117753
- https://doi.org//10.1089/brain.2017.0571
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nicl.2018.03.017
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2020.00227
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2017.05.050
- https://doi.org//10.1162/netn_a_00051
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2015.07.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nicl.2017.06.023
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.clinph.2019.08.009
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2014.12.020
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1400181111
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hbm.24770
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Radiology and Organ Imaging
- Decision Making
- Autonomic Nervous System
- Cellular Nervous System
- Biological Engineering
- Central Nervous System
- Sensory Systems
- Neuroscience
- Endocrinology
- Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
- Clinical Nursing: Tertiary (Rehabilitative)
- Image Processing
- Signal Processing
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering not elsewhere classified
- Stem Cells
- Neurogenetics
- Developmental Biology