Presentation1_Anti-Inflammatory Effects of Ginsenoside Rb3 in LPS-Induced Macrophages Through Direct Inhibition of TLR4 Signaling Pathway.pdf
Panax ginseng has therapeutic effects on various inflammation-related diseases. Ginsenoside Rb3 (GRb3), a natural compound with anti-inflammatory and immunomodulatory properties, is one of the main active panaxadiol extracted from Panax ginseng. We explored whether GRb3 inhibited LPS-mediated inflammation through TLR4/NF-κB/MAPK signaling in macrophages. GRb3 attenuated NO and PGE2 production by attenuating iNOS and COX2 expression. GRb3 also suppressed pro-inflammatory cytokines levels, including IL-1β, IL-6, and TNF-α. Moreover, GRb3 administration significantly suppressed NF-κB (p65) nuclear translocation and the phosphorylation levels of p65, IκBα, JNK, p38, and ERK dose-dependently. Molecular docking demonstrated that GRb3 could dock onto the hydrophobic binding site of TLR4/MD2 complex, with a binding energy of −8.79 kcal/mol. Molecular dynamics (MD) displayed stable TLR4-MD2-GRb3 modeling. GRb3 dose-dependently inhibited LPS binding to cell membranes and blocked TLR4 expression. Surface plasmon resonance imaging (SPRi) revealed that GRb3 had an excellent binding affinity to TLR4/MD2 complex. Notably, resatorvid (TAK242), a selective TLR4 inhibitor, did not increase the repressive influence of GRb3 in RAW264.7 macrophages. Moreover, TLR4 overexpression partially reversed the repressive roles of GRb3 on the NF-κB/MAPK pathway and inflammatory mediators. Collectively, our study strongly indicated that GRb3 attenuated LPS-mediated inflammation through direct inhibition of TLR4 signaling. A novel insight into the underlying mechanism of anti-inflammatory effects of GRb3 in macrophages was confirmed.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3390/molecules21080994
- https://doi.org//10.3390/md18110545
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopha.2019.109487
- https://doi.org//10.3390/molecules22050844
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2009.09.075
- https://doi.org//10.1021/bi901948j
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M400993200
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2020.04.149
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cellsig.2010.03.017
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jgr.2019.12.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbapap.2005.08.017
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbalip.2014.07.008
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.170.1.413
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.seppur.2007.06.014
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.176.10.6211
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2015.02.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736%2801%2906075-5
- https://doi.org//10.1080/14728222.2019.1676416
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu8090566
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.phrs.2020.105263
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12016-013-8402-y
- https://doi.org//10.1016/bs.ircmb.2017.07.007
- https://doi.org//10.1002/minf.201700130
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fgene.2019.00031
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s40291-018-0361-9
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature07830
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00018-014-1762-5
- https://doi.org//10.1254/jphs.crj05010x
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.171.10.5272
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M901429200
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2020.01210
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bios.2010.07.056
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbiotec.2013.11.026
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.niox.2019.04.011
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.002
- https://doi.org//10.3390/molecules25204815
- https://doi.org//10.1248/bpb.b13-00522
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.phrs.2018.11.001
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M705994200
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10142-014-0386-z
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopha.2018.10.018
- https://doi.org//10.1111/bph.12660
- https://doi.org//10.1161/CIRCRESAHA.118.313591
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41574-019-0286-3
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1704155114