Video_4_Shear Wave Measurements of a Gelatin’s Young’s Modulus.WMV
Gelatin is a commonly used material for analog experiments in geophysics, investigating fluid-filled fracture propagation (e.g., magmatic dikes), as well as fault slip. Quantification of its physical properties, such as the Young’s modulus, is important for scaling experimental results to nature. Traditional methods to do so are either time consuming or destructive and cannot be performed in situ. We present an optical measurement technique, using shear waves. Polarizing filters enable visualization of the deviatoric stresses in a block of gelatin, so shear wave propagation can be observed. We demonstrate how the wave velocity can be measured and related to the Young’s modulus, show how the results are comparable to another methodology and discuss processing techniques that maximize the measurement precision. This methodology is useful for experimentalist, as it is simple to implement into a laboratory setting, can make precise, time-efficient estimates of the material strength and additionally is non-destructive and can be performed in situ.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2010JB007993
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-246x.2000.00148.x
- https://doi.org//10.3389/feart.2019.00019
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tecto.2009.03.012
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.earth.30.091201.140909
- https://doi.org//10.1098/rspa.1972.0115
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.22.2.81
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2018.01.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tecto.2012.09.032
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4613-9371-9_9
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2001JB000589
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0031-9201(85)90113-X
- https://doi.org//10.1144/M39.11
- https://doi.org//10.1016/B978-0-12-420023-4.00002-2
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2009JB018191
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2018JB016311
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.foodhyd.2011.04.016
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-642-59723-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jvolgeores.2004.11.030
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0022112007005472
- https://doi.org//10.5194/se-8-597-2017
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.ea.23.050195.001443
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2018JB017005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.epsl.2011.01.032
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2009JB006298
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00445-010-0440-1
- https://doi.org//10.1029/JB095iB06p08471
- https://doi.org//10.1029/2017JB015376
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tecto.2016.06.019
- https://doi.org//10.1029/JB076i035p08544
- https://doi.org//10.1029/JB085iB02p00967
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Solid Earth Sciences
- Climate Science
- Evolutionary Impacts of Climate Change
- Atmospheric Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Exploration Geochemistry
- Inorganic Geochemistry
- Isotope Geochemistry
- Organic Geochemistry
- Geochemistry not elsewhere classified
- Igneous and Metamorphic Petrology
- Ore Deposit Petrology
- Palaeontology (incl. Palynology)
- Structural Geology
- Tectonics
- Volcanology
- Geology not elsewhere classified
- Seismology and Seismic Exploration
- Glaciology
- Hydrogeology
- Natural Hazards
- Quaternary Environments
- Earth Sciences not elsewhere classified