Video_2_Structural Modeling and Molecular Dynamics of the Immune Checkpoint Molecule HLA-G.mpg
HLA-G is considered to be an immune checkpoint molecule, a function that is closely linked to the structure and dynamics of the different HLA-G isoforms. Unfortunately, little is known about the structure and dynamics of these isoforms. For instance, there are only seven crystal structures of HLA-G molecules, being all related to a single isoform, and in some cases lacking important residues associated to the interaction with leukocyte receptors. In addition, they lack information on the dynamics of both membrane-bound HLA-G forms, and soluble forms. We took advantage of in silico strategies to disclose the dynamic behavior of selected HLA-G forms, including the membrane-bound HLA-G1 molecule, soluble HLA-G1 dimer, and HLA-G5 isoform. Both the membrane-bound HLA-G1 molecule and the soluble HLA-G1 dimer were quite stable. Residues involved in the interaction with ILT2 and ILT4 receptors (α3 domain) were very close to the lipid bilayer in the complete HLA-G1 molecule, which might limit accessibility. On the other hand, these residues can be completely exposed in the soluble HLA-G1 dimer, due to the free rotation of the disulfide bridge (Cys42/Cys42). In fact, we speculate that this free rotation of each protomer (i.e., the chains composing the dimer) could enable alternative binding modes for ILT2/ILT4 receptors, which in turn could be associated with greater affinity of the soluble HLA-G1 dimer. Structural analysis of the HLA-G5 isoform demonstrated higher stability for the complex containing the peptide and coupled β2-microglobulin, while structures lacking such domains were significantly unstable. This study reports for the first time structural conformations for the HLA-G5 isoform and the dynamic behavior of HLA-G1 molecules under simulated biological conditions. All modeled structures were made available through GitHub (https://github.com/KavrakiLab/), enabling their use as templates for modeling other alleles and isoforms, as well as for other computational analyses to investigate key molecular interactions.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1182/blood-2007-12-127662
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.2326636
- https://doi.org//10.1093/intimm/11.6.889
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.humimm.2003.08.346
- https://doi.org//10.2337/db05-0731
- https://doi.org//10.1182/blood-2004-03-0809
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.95.8.4510
- https://doi.org//10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-05-0097
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736(00)02386-2
- https://doi.org//10.1097/00002030-200202150-00005
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JVI.79.24.15226-15237.2005
- https://doi.org//10.1093/brain/awh609
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.0022-202x.2001.01487.x
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.212643199
- https://doi.org//10.1084/jem.186.11.1809
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M512305200
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.4866
- https://doi.org//10.3324/haematol.2014.113803
- https://doi.org//10.1002/eji.200737515
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.84.24.9145
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.89.9.3947
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0198-8859(00)00197-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0065-2776(03)81006-4
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00018-010-0580-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.it.2007.11.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0960-9822(02)00481-5
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1343
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1431057100
- https://doi.org//10.1002/eji.200737089
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00018-012-1069-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jim.2005.09.016
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.humimm.2013.11.001
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.176.5.3266
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/28.1.235
- https://doi.org//10.1002/cpbi.3
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0409676102
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jmb.2007.07.050
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkv342
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bioinformatics/btq662
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkx332
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1853201
- https://doi.org//10.1038/356083a0
- https://doi.org//10.1002/pro.5560020916
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/29.1.221
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.24489
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.23702
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jctc.8b01066
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.softx.2015.06.001
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nmeth.4067
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmolb.2017.00013
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bpj.2015.08.015
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jctc.5b00743
- https://doi.org//10.3390/molecules24050881
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pcbi.1005659
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0155183
- https://doi.org//10.1200/CCI.19.00123
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2020.01583
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nprot.2016.169
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.20084
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.275.20.15232
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2014/657625
- https://doi.org//10.1034/j.1600-065x.2002.19004.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.it.2008.02.012
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41423-019-0258-5
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkz950
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.humimm.2016.01.020
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.171.3.1376
- https://doi.org//10.1002/immu.200390015
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1399-0039.1996.tb02647.x
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.168.12.6208
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.immuni.2017.11.018
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2012.00258
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2567.2007.02623.x
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1601296
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity