image1_Analytical Characterization of 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MMC in Seized Products and Biosamples: The Role of LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS and Solid Deposition GC-FTIR.jpg
Among the phencyclidine (PCP) and synthetic cathinone analogs present on the street market, 3-methoxyphencyclidine (3-MeO-PCP) is one of the most popular dissociative hallucinogen drugs, while 3-methylmethcathinone (3-MMC) is a commonly encountered psychostimulant. Numerous 3-MeO-PCP- and 3-MMC-related intoxication cases have been reported worldwide. Identification of the positional isomers of MeO-PCP and MMC families are particularly challenging for clinical and forensic laboratories; this is mostly due to their difficult chromatographic separation (particularly when using liquid chromatography–LC) and similar mass spectrometric behaviors. 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MMC were identified in two powders, detained by two subjects and seized by the police, by different analytical techniques, including liquid chromatography-high-resolution accurate-mass Orbitrap mass spectrometry (LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS), and solid deposition gas chromatography-Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (sd-GC-FTIR). LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS allowed us to assign the elemental formulae C18H27NO (MeO-PCP) and C11H15NO (MMC) through accurate mass measurement of the two MH+ ions, and the comparison of experimental and calculated MH+ isotopic patterns. However, MH+ collision-induced product ions spectra were not conclusive in discriminating between the positional isomers [(3-MeO-PCP vs. 4-MeO-PCP) and (3-MMC vs. 4-MMC and 2-MMC)]. Likewise, sd-GC-FTIR easily allowed us to differentiate between the MeO-PCP and MMC positional isomers unambiguously, confirming the presence of 3-MeO-PCP and 3-MMC, due to the high-quality match factor of the experimental FTIR spectra against the target FTIR spectra of MeO-PCP and MMC isomers in a dedicated library. 3-MeO-PCP (in contrast to 3-MMC) was also detected in blood and urine samples of both subjects and analyzed in the context of routine forensic casework by LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS following a simple deproteinization step. In addition, this untargeted approach allowed us to detect dozens of phase I and phase II 3-MeO-PCP metabolites in all biological specimens. Analysis of the extracted samples by sd-GC-FTIR revealed the presence of 3-MeO-PCP, thus confirming the intake of such specific methoxy-PCP isomer in both cases. These results highlight the effectiveness of LC-HRAM-Orbitrap-MS and sd-GC-FTIR data in attaining full structural characterization of the psychoactive drugs, even in absence of reference standards, in both non-biological and biological specimens.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dta.2550
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.toxac.2018.11.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.003
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bky097
- https://doi.org//10.3109/15563650.2015.1079325
- https://doi.org//10.3109/15563650.2014.981823
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkw056
- https://doi.org//10.1097/MD.0000000000018295
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.12.028
- https://doi.org//10.1373/clinchem.2016.264507
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jflm.2019.05.011
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2018.11.024
- https://doi.org//10.1002/rcm.4842
- https://doi.org//10.1002/rcm.7211
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.01.039
- https://doi.org//10.1002/rcm.7425
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkz026
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.toxac.2019.10.004
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkw058
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2017.02.034
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00414-018-1901-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.109900
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forc.2020.100225
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00915
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0003702817746964
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.drugalcdep.2019.06.011
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11419-019-00502-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.03.025
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jchromb.2017.01.046
- https://doi.org//10.1021/jm00326a019
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2019.02.040
- https://doi.org//10.2174/1570159X14666161018151716
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkx048
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dta.1620
- https://doi.org//10.1002/elps.201800142
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2016.06.034
- https://doi.org//10.1080/14737175.2019.1666712
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkz001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32231-7
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dta.1369
- https://doi.org//10.1002/rcm.6383
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.forsciint.2011.04.020
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fchem.2020.00624
- https://doi.org//10.1093/chromsci/24.8.330
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acschemneuro.8b00147
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jflm.2014.04.007
- https://doi.org//10.1007/164_2018_124
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dta.1468
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.toxlet.2014.06.012
- https://doi.org//10.1057/s41271-018-0156-6
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jat/bkx009
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00450618.2016.1167240
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Geochemistry
- Biochemistry
- Organic Chemistry
- Medical Biochemistry: Proteins and Peptides (incl. Medical Proteomics)
- Nuclear Chemistry
- Medical Biochemistry and Metabolomics not elsewhere classified
- Analytical Biochemistry
- Cell Neurochemistry
- Physical Organic Chemistry
- Enzymes
- Organic Green Chemistry
- Environmental Chemistry (incl. Atmospheric Chemistry)
- Catalysis and Mechanisms of Reactions
- Electroanalytical Chemistry
- Analytical Chemistry not elsewhere classified
- Environmental Chemistry
- Food Chemistry and Molecular Gastronomy (excl. Wine)
- Inorganic Chemistry
CC BY 4.0