Image_4_Autophagy Receptor Tollip Facilitates Bacterial Autophagy by Recruiting Galectin-7 in Response to Group A Streptococcus Infection.jpeg
Bacterial autophagy—a type of macroautophagy that is also termed xenophagy—selectively targets intracellular bacteria such as group A Streptococcus (GAS), a ubiquitous pathogen that causes numerous serious diseases, including pharyngitis, skin infections, and invasive life-threatening infections. Although bacterial autophagy is known to eliminate invading bacteria via the action of autophagy receptors, the underlying mechanism remains unclear. Herein, we elucidated that Tollip functions as a bacterial-autophagy receptor in addition to participating involved in the intracellular immunity mechanism that defends against bacterial infection. Tollip was recruited to GAS-containing endosomal vacuoles prior to the escape of GAS into the cytosol; additionally, Tollip knockout disrupted the recruitment of other autophagy receptors, such as NBR1, TAX1BP1, and NDP52, to GAS-containing autophagosomes and led to prolonged intracellular survival of GAS. Furthermore, Tollip was found to be required for the recruitment of galectin-1 and -7 to GAS-containing autophagosomes, and immunoprecipitation results indicated that Tollip interacts with galectin-7. Lastly, our data also revealed that galectin-1 and -7 are involved in the restriction of GAS replication in cells. These results demonstrated that Tollip modulates bacterial autophagy by recruiting other autophagy receptors and galectins.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-017-17332-y
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.micpath.2007.02.003
- https://doi.org//10.1042/BJ20102160
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.96.20.11329
- https://doi.org//10.1242/jcs.126128
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.devcel.2016.08.003
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mib.2013.11.006
- https://doi.org//10.1128/mBio.00899-17
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrmicro2648
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.chom.2016.11.002
- https://doi.org//10.1091/mbc.e08-02-0166
- https://doi.org//10.1128/mra.01212-19
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcel.2013.10.024
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcel.2018.03.009
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M109360200
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cmi.12981
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2014.05.048
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1232033
- https://doi.org//10.15252/embj.201796463
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M113.484170
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.leu.2402870
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.immuni.2013.10.020
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1103966
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-020-14533-4
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0147061
- https://doi.org//10.1038/cr.2013.169
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.201402054
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1462-5822.2009.01415.x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature10744
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15548627.2019.1628539
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.ppat.1005174
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.chom.2015.02.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.str.2015.07.017