Image_3_The Assessment of Dual-Cycle Identity Models Among Secondary School Students: The Hungarian Adaptation of DIDS and U-MICS.JPEG
The aim of the present study was to evaluate the factor structure and validity of the Hungarian versions of the Dimensions for Identity Development Scale (DIDS) and Utrecht-Management of Identity Commitments Scale (U-MICS). Both models assume that the iterative process of exploring and evolving commitments occurs in two distinct cycles. The sample for testing the factor structure of DIDS consisted of 808 adolescents (357 boys and 451 girls) aged between 14 and 21 years (Mage = 16.86; SD = 1.35). The sample for testing the factor structure of U-MICS consisted of 803 adolescents (353 boys and 450 girls) aged between 14 and 21 years (Mage = 16.88; SD = 1.34). Results indicated a five factor model of DIDS in the present sample. All the five dimensions correlated as hypothesized both internally and externally. In line with previous research, six clusters emerged based on the dimensions of DIDS, including ruminative moratorium. Regarding U-MICS, results indicated a three factor model in the present sample. All the three dimensions were internally and externally correlated as hypothesized regarding both ideological and interpersonal identity domains. With regard to the identity status cluster solution, five clusters emerged in both the educational and friendship domains. We found specific variation regarding identity clusters in the two identity domains. Our results support the use of these two measurements in Hungarian context. Further, our results confirm the divergent developmental dynamics of ideological and interpersonal identity domains.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jrp.2007.04.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2007.09.002
- https://doi.org//10.1177/000306515600400104
- https://doi.org//10.1037/h0023281
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.12.006
- https://doi.org//10.1027/1015-5759/a000024
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1073191115584969
- https://doi.org//10.1080/19012276.2016.1245156
- https://doi.org//10.5350/DAJPN2014270101
- https://doi.org//10.4992/jjpsy.85.13074
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2014.04.012
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-010-9606-6
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.006
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2010.11.013
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17405629.2016.1241175
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-005-8949-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2005.03.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.10.018
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.appdev.2014.03.007
- https://doi.org//10.1177/074355488723003
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-8624.2010.01492.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cdep.12226
- https://doi.org//10.1177/2167696817694698
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11205-014-0668-9
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01364
- https://doi.org//10.1027/1015-5759/a000241
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-007-9222-2
- https://doi.org//10.1027/1016-9040/a000076
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.09.001
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-013-0005-7
- https://doi.org//10.1556/Mental.15.2014.3.7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0191-8869(00)00113-6
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10705519909540118
- https://doi.org//10.1109/TAC.1974.1100705
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17405629.2011.576858
- https://doi.org//10.2307/3001913
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF01537355
- https://doi.org//10.1006/drev.1999.0483
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1745-6924.2008.00088.x
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15374410709336569
- https://doi.org//10.1002/j.2167-4086.2006.tb00065.x
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15283488.2014.944699
- https://doi.org//10.1207/S1532706XID030203
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0272431685051007
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.adolescence.2019.01.003
- https://doi.org//10.1111/sode.12027
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-019-01182-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2018.10.023
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jclp.22141
- https://doi.org//10.2478/ppb-2013-0032
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10804-014-9188-8
- https://doi.org//10.1177/2167696813484004
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0165025416664432
- https://doi.org//10.13110/merrpalmquar1982.62.3.0252
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.avb.2017.08.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2016.02.028
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.erap.2011.05.002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10964-018-0924-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jrp.2014.03.004
- https://doi.org//10.1023/A%3A1022543419747
- https://doi.org//10.1006/jado.2001.0446
CC BY 4.0