Image_3_Mitochondrial Zea mays Brittle1-1 Is a Major Determinant of the Metabolic Fate of Incoming Sucrose and Mitochondrial Function in Developing Maize Endosperms.pdf
Zea mays Brittle1-1 (ZmBT1-1) is an essential component of the starch biosynthetic machinery in maize endosperms, enabling ADPglucose transport from cytosol to amyloplast in exchange for AMP or ADP. Although ZmBT1-1 has been long considered to be an amyloplast-specific marker, evidence has been provided that ZmBT1-1 is dually localized to plastids and mitochondria (Bahaji et al., 2011b). The mitochondrial localization of ZmBT1-1 suggested that this protein may have as-yet unidentified function(s). To understand the mitochondrial ZmBT1-1 function(s), we produced and characterized transgenic Zmbt1-1 plants expressing ZmBT1-1 delivered specifically to mitochondria. Metabolic and differential proteomic analyses showed down-regulation of sucrose synthase (SuSy)-mediated channeling of sucrose into starch metabolism, and up-regulation of the conversion of sucrose breakdown products generated by cell wall invertase (CWI) into ethanol and alanine, in Zmbt1-1 endosperms compared to wild-type. Electron microscopic analyses of Zmbt1-1 endosperm cells showed gross alterations in the mitochondrial ultrastructure. Notably, the protein expression pattern, metabolic profile, and aberrant mitochondrial ultrastructure of Zmbt1-1 endosperms were rescued by delivering ZmBT1-1 specifically to mitochondria. Results presented here provide evidence that the reduced starch content in Zmbt1-1 endosperms is at least partly due to (i) mitochondrial dysfunction, (ii) enhanced CWI-mediated channeling of sucrose into ethanol and alanine metabolism, and (iii) reduced SuSy-mediated channeling of sucrose into starch metabolism due to the lack of mitochondrial ZmBT1-1. Our results also strongly indicate that (a) mitochondrial ZmBT1-1 is an important determinant of the metabolic fate of sucrose entering the endosperm cells, and (b) plastidic ZmBT1-1 is not the sole ADPglucose transporter in maize endosperm amyloplasts. The possible involvement of mitochondrial ZmBT1-1 in exchange between intramitochondrial AMP and cytosolic ADP is discussed.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-018-33647-w
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.113.1.127
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.06.006
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-313X.2011.04767.x
- https://doi.org//10.1093/pcp/pcr019
- https://doi.org//10.1093/pcp/pcp108
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M506045200
- https://doi.org//10.1105/tpc.2.6.581
- https://doi.org//10.1111/tpj.14053
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/erl297
- https://doi.org//10.1093/mp/ssq065
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.15.01911
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1399-3054.1996.tb00530.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1399-3054.1995.tb00825.x
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1741-7007-12-34
- https://doi.org//10.1105/tpc.8.6.971
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s004380050792
- https://doi.org//10.1105/tpc.105.035287
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF01969712
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.86.4.1013
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0504682102
- https://doi.org//10.1006/jmbi.2000.3903
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M400445200
- https://doi.org//10.1093/pcp/pce108
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.102.015081
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2012.00002
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.108.131300
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/erl006
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M702484200
- https://doi.org//10.1016/1360-1385(96)83884-2
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tplants.2014.09.004
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.119.2.497
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2013.00004
- https://doi.org//10.1093/pcp/pcs180
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-313X.2010.04149.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jplph.2009.01.002
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.106.092148
- https://doi.org//10.1093/pcp/pcm171
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-313X.1997.11051095.x
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-313X.1999.00464.x
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.106.086975
- https://doi.org//10.1093/emboj/21.3.221
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0167-4889(01)00146-X
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.97.4.1565
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-7652.2008.00368.x
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.17.1.208
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mito.2007.01.002
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.16.00945
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.110.3.835
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.117.4.1235
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pce.12312
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.103.020552
- https://doi.org//10.1023/A:1005969830314
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF00203647
- https://doi.org//10.1105/tpc.3.12.1337
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/erw327
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tcb.2017.04.004
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/eri087
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-313X.2004.02016.x
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M510425200
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-59745-494-0_3
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.73.1.56
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.arplant.57.032905.105421