Image_3_Enzalutamide-Induced Upregulation of PCAT6 Promotes Prostate Cancer Neuroendocrine Differentiation by Regulating miR-326/HNRNPA2B1 Axis.tif
Our previous studies have demonstrated that Enzalutamide-induced upregulation of long non-coding RNA p21 (lncRNA-p21) facilitates prostate cancer (PCa) neuroendocrine differentiation (NED). Given the important role of lncRNAs in PCa pathogenesis, and given that lots of lncRNAs are dys-regulated in neuroendocrine PCa (NEPC) patients, we next explored the biological function and underlying mechanism of lncRNA-PCAT6 (PCAT6) in mediating Enzalutamide-induced NED. The level of PCAT6 in Enzalutamide-treated PCa cells and NEPC samples were assessed using quantitative RT-PCR (qPCR). The effect of PCAT6 on PCa cell proliferation, invasion, and NED was evaluated through CCK-8, transwell, qPCR, western blot analysis, Xenograft mouse model, and in vivo lung metastasis model. We found that PCAT6 was highly expressed in NE-like cells (PC3, DU145, and NCI-H660) compared with androgen-sensitive LNCaP cells. PCAT6 was also highly expressed in NEPC tissues. Enzalutamide treatment resulted in a significant increase of PCAT6 level in a dose- and time-dependent fashion. Functionally, PCAT6 overexpression promoted NED of C4-2 cells, as evidenced by an increased expression of NE markers (NSE, ChgA, and SYP), whereas PCAT6 knockdown in NCI-H661 cells repressed NED. Furthermore, PCAT6 overexpression promoted PCa cell proliferation and invasion in vitro and in vivo. Mechanistically, PCAT6 functioned as competing endogenous (ce) RNA via absorbing miR-326, thus resulting in a de-suppression of Hnrnpa2b1 target gene. The current results demonstrate that PCAT6 acted as a tumor activator in PCa progression by sponging miR-326 and increasing Hnrnpa2b1 expression and that the PCAT6/miR-326/Hnrnpa2b1 signaling might be a new therapeutic target for PCa.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3322/caac.21387
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41391-018-0079-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ucl.2017.07.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.eururo.2014.06.045
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M113.477216
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.canlet.2018.09.020
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ccell.2016.03.010
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms19051310
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cpr.12381
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cas.13642
- https://doi.org//10.26355/eurrev_201808_15718
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ebiom.2018.10.004
- https://doi.org//10.26355/eurrev_201903_17233
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nsmb.2591
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molmed.2014.03.005
- https://doi.org//10.1042/BJ20100396
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.11.044
- https://doi.org//10.1042/BSR20190318
- https://doi.org//10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-10-4410
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-019-09784-9
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15384101.2018.1496741
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature12986
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkt1248
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-018-24424-w
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms20051154
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1442-2042.2012.02997.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/iju.14303
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1700089
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.clgc.2017.12.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.10.136
- https://doi.org//10.4149/gpb_2019044
- https://doi.org//10.1002/cbf.3510
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mc.23199
- https://doi.org//10.2147/OTT.S237559
- https://doi.org//10.2147/OTT.S232354
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopha.2018.09.053
- https://doi.org//10.2147/CMAR.S267927