Image_2_Novel Biomarkers of Dynamic Blood PD-L1 Expression for Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Advanced Non-Small-Cell Lung Cancer Patients.jpeg
Immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) have become a high-profile regimen for malignancy recently. However, only a small subpopulation obtains long-term clinical benefit. How to select optimal patients by reasonable biomarkers remains a hot topic.
MethodsPaired tissue samples and blood samples from 51 patients with advanced malignancies were collected for correlation analysis. Dynamic changes in blood PD-L1 (bPD-L1) expression, including PD-L1 mRNA, exosomal PD-L1 (exoPD-L1) protein and soluble PD-L1 (sPD-L1), were detected after 2 months of ICIs treatment in advanced non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) patients. The best cutoff values for progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) of all three biomarkers were calculated with R software.
ResultsIn 51 cases of various malignancies, those with positive tissue PD-L1 (tPD-L1) had significantly higher PD-L1 mRNA than those with negative tPD-L1. In 40 advanced NSCLC patients, those with a fold change of PD-L1 mRNA ≥ 2.04 had better PFS, OS and best objective response (bOR) rate. In addition, a fold change of exoPD-L1 ≥ 1.86 was also found to be associated with better efficacy and OS in a cohort of 21 advanced NSCLC cases. The dynamic change of sPD-L1 was not associated with efficacy and OS. Furthermore, the combination of PD-L1 mRNA and exoPD-L1 could screen better patients for potential benefit from ICIs treatment.
ConclusionThere was a positive correlation between bPD-L1 and tPD-L1 expression. Increased expression of PD-L1 mRNA, exoPD-L1, or both in early stage of ICIs treatment could serve as positive biomarkers of efficacy and OS in advanced NSCLC patients.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1709937
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1504627
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature21349
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdz011
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamaoncol.2019.2187
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.19.00934
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1470-2045(16)30406-5
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.2017.75.7740
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.aan4236
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.aan6733
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2018.09.035
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1917346
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1606774
- https://doi.org//10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0698
- https://doi.org//10.1158/2159-8290.CD-15-1545
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1613493
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nm1517
- https://doi.org//10.1158/2159-8290.CD-13-0310
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0123410
- https://doi.org//10.1038/bjc.2015.101
- https://doi.org//10.1172/JCI67313
- https://doi.org//10.1097/JTO.0000000000000500
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamaoncol.2018.7098
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamaoncol.2017.4771
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41586-018-0392-8
- https://doi.org//10.1158/2326-6066.CIR-16-0329
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejca.2017.02.015
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736(16)32517-X
- https://doi.org//10.1038/bjc.2018.9
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ccell.2016.10.009
- https://doi.org//10.1126/sciadv.aar2766
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2019.02.016
- https://doi.org//10.1080/20013078.2019.1710899
- https://doi.org//10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-10-0250
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cllc.2018.04.014
- https://doi.org//10.1080/2162402X.2018.1452581
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molonc.2015.05.009
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12885-016-2758-3
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep31726
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.lungcan.2018.04.001
- https://doi.org//10.1080/2162402X.2018.1438111
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity