Image_1_Validity and Reliability of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-6 (SAVE-6) Scale to Measure Viral Anxiety of Healthcare Workers in Spain During the COVID-19 Pandemic.PNG
This study examined the validity and applicability of the Spanish version of the Stress and Anxiety to Viral Epidemics-6 items (SAVE-6) scale, which can be usually applied to the general population, to healthcare workers to briefly measure their anxiety responses to the viral epidemic. A total of 135 healthcare workers participated in this online survey from January to July 2021. Participants' sociodemographic characteristics were gathered, and their psychiatric symptoms were rated using SAVE-6, Goldberg Anxiety and Depression Scale (GDAS), and the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI). The confirmatory factor analysis was conducted to examine the validity of the scales. The single-structure model of the SAVE-6 scale was adopted based on the results of the parallel analysis. We decided on the SAVE-6 scale, as it proved to be a good fit to measure healthcare workers' anxiety response to the viral epidemic. SAVE-6 showed good internal consistency (Cronbach's alpha = 0.827 and McDonald's omega = 0.834) and good convergent validity with Goldberg anxiety (r = 0.434, p < 0.001) and depression (r = 0.193, p = 0.043) scores, and PSQI score (r = 0.262, p = 0.002). The Spanish version of SAVE-6 is a reliable and valid rating scale to assess the anxiety response of healthcare workers specifically to the viral epidemic as a brief measure during the COVID-19 pandemic.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000178
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11739-020-02543-5
- https://doi.org//10.1136/jech-2012-202014
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijdrr.2021.102524
- https://doi.org//10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_1029_20
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajem.2021.08.027
- https://doi.org//10.2196/25489
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.615387
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.rpsmen.2020.05.002
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17155514
- https://doi.org//10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e319
- https://doi.org//10.24869/psyd.2020.549
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.sleep.2021.06.035
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcop.22680
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph18179377
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2021.669606
- https://doi.org//10.3346/jkms.2021.36.e168
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.746244
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.705805
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.701543
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2020.604441
- https://doi.org//10.1002/art.1790100613
- https://doi.org//10.1136/bmj.297.6653.897
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0165-1781(89)90047-4
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00296-014-2960-z
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF02289447
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0013164495055003002
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0023353
- https://doi.org//10.3758/BF03192753
- https://doi.org//10.1002/wps.20798
- https://doi.org//10.1192/j.eurpsy.2021.28
- https://doi.org//10.1002/wps.20803
- https://doi.org//10.17241/smr.2021.01025