Image_1_Prealbumin as a Predictor of Prognosis in Patients With Coronavirus Disease 2019.TIF
Background: The predictive value of prealbumin for the prognosis of coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) has not been extensively investigated.
Methods: A total of 1,115 patients with laboratory-confirmed COVID-19 were enrolled at Tongji hospital from February to April 2020 and classified into fatal (n = 129) and recovered (n = 986) groups according to the patient's outcome. Prealbumin and other routine laboratory indicators were measured simultaneously.
Results: The level of prealbumin on admission was significantly lower in fatal patients than in recovered patients. For predicting the prognosis of COVID-19, the performance of prealbumin was better than most routine laboratory indicators, such as albumin, lymphocyte count, neutrophil count, hypersensitive C-reactive protein, d-dimer, lactate dehydrogenase, creatinine, and hypersensitive cardiac troponin I. When a threshold of 126 mg/L was used to discriminate between fatal and recovered patients, the sensitivity and specificity of prealbumin were, respectively, 78.29 and 90.06%. Furthermore, a model based on the combination of nine indexes showed an improved performance in predicting the death of patients with COVID-19. Using a cut-off value of 0.19, the prediction model was able to distinguish between fatal and recovered individuals with a sensitivity of 86.82% and a specificity of 90.37%.
Conclusions: A lower level of prealbumin on admission may indicate a worse outcome of COVID-19. Immune and nutritional status may be vital factors for predicting disease progression in the early stage of COVID-19.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa2001191
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa2001017
- https://doi.org//10.1136/bmj.m1091
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jama.2020.6775
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.chest.2020.04.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cmi.2020.04.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jaci.2020.04.006
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.021
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12931-020-01352-w
- https://doi.org//10.1515/cclm-2020-0369
- https://doi.org//10.1183/13993003.00524-2020
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jth.14768
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jth.14848
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jth.14859
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cei.13450
- https://doi.org//10.1172/jci.insight.137799
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104370
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jmv.25900
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0047-6374(85)80023-3
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ncp.10271
- https://doi.org//10.3748/wjg.15.467
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jinf.2020.04.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.054
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jinf.2020.03.041
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dmrr.3319
- https://doi.org//10.2307/2531595
- https://doi.org//10.2807/1560-7917.ES.2020.25.9.2000178
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijid.2020.03.050
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tmaid.2020.101653
- https://doi.org//10.1136/bmj.m1461
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S2213-2600(20)30161-2
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamainternmed.2020.0994
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2018/7805857
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12663-012-0376-4
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s13054-016-1208-6
- https://doi.org//10.1100/tsw.2010.181
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.coviro.2011.07.002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00281-016-0558-0
- https://doi.org//10.18632/aging.102595
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-virology-101416-041734
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2018.02640
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa2002032
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jcv.2020.104392
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Radiology and Organ Imaging
- Foetal Development and Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Medical Genetics (excl. Cancer Genetics)
- Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Dermatology
- Emergency Medicine
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Intensive Care
- Primary Health Care
- Nephrology and Urology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Orthopaedics
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Pathology (excl. Oral Pathology)
- Family Care