Image_1_Identification of a Novel Salt Tolerance-Related Locus in Wild Soybean (Glycine soja Sieb. & Zucc.).JPEG
Salinity is an important abiotic stress factor that affects growth and yield of soybean. NY36-87 is a wild soybean germplasm with high salt tolerance. In this study, two F2:3 mapping populations derived from NY36-87 and two salt-sensitive soybean cultivars, Zhonghuang39 and Peking, were used to map salt tolerance-related genes. The two populations segregated as 1 (tolerant):2 (heterozygous):1 (sensitive), indicating a Mendelian segregation model. Using simple sequence repeat (SSR) markers together with the bulked segregant analysis (BSA) mapping strategy, we mapped a salt tolerance locus on chromosome 03 in F2:3 population Zhonghuang39×NY36-87 to a 98-kb interval, in which the known gene GmSALT3 co-segregated with the salt tolerance locus. In the F2:3 population of Peking×NY36-87, the dominant salt tolerance-associated gene was detected and mapped on chromosome 18. We named this gene GmSALT18 and fine mapped it to a 241-kb region. Time course analysis and a grafting experiment confirmed that Peking accumulated more Na+ in the shoot via a root-based mechanism. These findings reveal that the tolerant wild soybean line NY36-87 contains salt tolerance-related genes GmSALT3 and GmSALT18, providing genetic material and a novel locus for breeding salt-tolerant soybean.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci1969.0011183X000900060006x
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci1964.0011183X000400020010x
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2229-8-125
- https://doi.org//10.1071/AR08104
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep19147
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-017-3015-0
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.126.1.363
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cj.2014.09.001
- https://doi.org//10.1111/tpj.12695
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10681-013-0944-9
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10681-011-0347-8
- https://doi.org//10.1270/jsbbs.58.355
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms21031023
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.13536
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ng.715
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-004-1783-9
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-018-0845-7
- https://doi.org//10.3724/SP.J.1006.2011.01266
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01485
- https://doi.org//10.1006/meth.2001.1262
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molp.2017.03.006
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.arplant.59.032607.092911
- https://doi.org//10.1081/CSS-200050280
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep19199
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncomms5340
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pce.13947
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00122-010-1304-y
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11032-017-0634-8
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2016.07.0600
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1744-7909.2012.01110.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2016.08.029
CC BY 4.0