Image_1_Generation of Marker-Free Transgenic Rice Resistant to Rice Blast Disease Using Ac/Ds Transposon-Mediated Transgene Reintegration System.pdf
Rice blast is one of the most serious diseases of rice and a major threat to rice production. Breeding disease-resistant rice is one of the most economical, safe, and effective measures for the control of rice blast. As a complement to traditional crop breeding, the transgenic method can avoid the time-consuming process of crosses and multi-generation selection. In this study, maize (Zea mays) Activator (Ac)/Dissociation (Ds) transposon vectors carrying green fluorescent protein (GFP) and red fluorescent protein (mCherry) genetic markers were used for generating marker-free transgenic rice. Double fluorescent protein-aided counterselection against the presence of T-DNA was performed together with polymerase chain reaction (PCR)-based positive selection for the gene of interest (GOI) to screen marker-free progeny. We cloned an RNAi expression cassette of the rice Pi21 gene that negatively regulates resistance to rice blast as a GOI into the Ds element in the Ac/Ds vector and obtained marker-free T1 rice plants from 13 independent transgenic lines. Marker-free and Ds/GOI-homozygous rice lines were verified by PCR and Southern hybridization analysis to be completely free of transgenic markers and T-DNA sequences. qRT-PCR analysis and rice blast disease inoculation confirmed that the marker-free transgenic rice lines exhibited decreased Pi21 expression levels and increased resistance to rice blast. TAIL-PCR results showed that the Ds (Pi21-RNAi) transgenes in two rice lines were reintegrated in intergenic regions in the rice genome. The Ac/Ds vector with dual fluorescent protein markers offers more reliable screening of marker-free transgenic progeny and can be utilized in the transgenic breeding of rice disease resistance and other agronomic traits.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11248-008-9182-7
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci2007.06.0370
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.13178
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s002990050526
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.aai8898
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s001220100611
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1175550
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.114.246173
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-genet-120215-035320
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11248-019-00179-6
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-313X.2003.01948.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.12491
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-62703-568-2_5
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jipb.12774
- https://doi.org//10.1111/mpp.12286
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.pbi.2019.03.015
- https://doi.org//10.3969/mpb.010.000121
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01608
- https://doi.org//10.2144/000112601
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-313X.1995.08030457.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1369-5266(98)80016-2
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12896-015-0212-2
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.12472
- https://doi.org//10.13271/j.mpb.018.000433
- https://doi.org//10.1534/genetics.105.044891
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jplph.2008.08.002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12038-012-9187-5
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jgg.2018.11.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.rsci.2020.05.003
- https://doi.org//10.13271/j.mpb.015.004451
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01834
- https://doi.org//10.3969/mpb.011.000701
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molp.2018.09.007