Image_1_Construction of a Shuttle Vector Using an Endogenous Plasmid From the Cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803.PDF
To advance synthetic biology in the photosynthetic cyanobacterium Synechocystis sp. PCC6803 (Syn6803), we constructed a shuttle vector with some versatile features. This shuttle vector, pSCB-YFP, consists of a putative replicon identified on the plasmid pCC5.2, the origin of replication of pMB1 from E. coli, as well as the YFP reporter gene and a spectinomycin/streptomycin resistance cassette. pSCB-YFP is stably maintained in Syn6803M (a motile strain that lacks the endogenous pCC5.2) and expresses YFP. In addition, we engineered a fragment into pSCB-YFP that has multiple cloning sites and other features such that this plasmid can also be used as an expression vector (pSCBe). The shuttle vector pSCB-YFP can be stably maintained for at least 50 generations without antibiotic selection. It is a high copy number plasmid and can stably co-exist with the RSF1010-based pPMQAK1-GFP.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0378-1119(86)90307-0
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.01174-12
- https://doi.org//10.1128/mBio.00949-16
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.96.6.3188
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2014.00036
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.2997920
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1754-1611-8-4
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2014.00040
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1574-6968.1986.tb01808.x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/bf00330208
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1521916113
- https://doi.org//10.1099/mic.0.000377
- https://doi.org//10.1006/plas.1993.1037
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0165-022x(01)00213-5
- https://doi.org//10.1128/jb.179.6.1998-2005.1997
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0076-6879(88)67086-8
- https://doi.org//10.1038/NMETH.1318
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1574-6968.2011.02368.x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/bf00014672
- https://doi.org//10.1016/B978-0-12-385075-1.00024-X
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkq164
- https://doi.org//10.1023/A:1013887908680
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.25722
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2014.00012
- https://doi.org//10.1093/dnares/10.5.221
- https://doi.org//10.1093/dnares/3.3.109
- https://doi.org//10.1006/plas.1994.1063
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0147-619X(83)90068-9
- https://doi.org//10.1271/bbb.58.796
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0147-619X(83)90072-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbiotec.2015.11.014
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13280-012-0274-5
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.plasmid.2009.05.001
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature11516
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.5b00202
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.0034983
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/erm112
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkp045
- https://doi.org//10.1271/bbb.60.377
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gku673
- https://doi.org//10.1271/bbb.59.1217
- https://doi.org//10.1093/dnares/dss024
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.77.3.1570
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0076-6879(88)67088-1
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.81.5.1561
- https://doi.org//10.1006/plas.1997.1281
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1323725111
- https://doi.org//10.1128/jb.175.13.3981-3991.1993
- https://doi.org//10.1006/plas.1994.1014