Image_1_Consequences of Lockdown During COVID-19 Pandemic in Lifestyle and Emotional State of Children in Argentina.JPEG
The implications of the coronavirus disease (COVID-19) lockdown measurements and social isolation in children and their parents are still unknown. The aims of this study were to examine the impact of COVID-19 lockdown on emotional state, feelings and lifestyle of children and their parents, to explore the association between parental characteristics and child well-being and to examine whether the impact of lockdown depends on socio-economic status. Parents completed an online survey including data about socio-demographic information, parent and child feelings and lifestyle during lockdown. Logistic regression and correlation analysis were used to establish associations between variables. In total, 814 parents with children between 4 and 11 were included in the study. According to parents, 69.5% of the children showed changes in their emotional state, 55.3% altered their routine and 62.6% showed sleep disorders. Families with lower socio-economic status were more worried about health, shortage of food and household income (p < 0.01). Parent and children concern about food/essential items were highly associated [OR (CI 95%) 13.0 (6.81, 26.5), p < 0.01]. Adverse children's emotional state was associated with parental feeling of loneliness (r = 0.35) and inversely associated with keeping a routine (r = −0.11). Sleep changes were inversely associated with keeping a routine and having a balcony/garden (r = −0.53 and −0.16). We conclude that lockdown affected emotional state and lifestyle of children and parents, which were strongly related. Routine and positive parental attitude supported children's well-being. Economic issues were an important concern in families with lower socio-economic status. Our findings can help to promote child health during lockdown.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2020.603014
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2020.565688
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu12072152
- https://doi.org//10.4081/ripppo.2020.494
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17218180
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpubh.2021.567552
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12967-020-02399-5
- https://doi.org//10.1037/tra0000672
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17176236
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbi.2020.05.061
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2020.06.029
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1456
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S2352-4642%2820%2930096-1
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2020.579038
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph18073432
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fped.2020.00573
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12966-020-00987-8
- https://doi.org//10.1002/oby.22861
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12887-021-02704-1
- https://doi.org//10.1542/peds.2020-007294
- https://doi.org//10.1542/peds.2020-016824
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17051729
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph18010176
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamapediatrics.2020.1619
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17207666
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00787-020-01507-6
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01713
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.2517-6161.1995.tb02031.x
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0033-2909.112.1.155
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyt.2021.626456
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12966-015-0197-1
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-021-87270-3
- https://doi.org//10.1002/wmh3.365