Image_1_A Simple in situ Assay to Assess Plant-Associative Bacterial Nitrogenase Activity.tif
Assessment of plant-associative bacterial nitrogen (N) fixation is crucial for selection and development of elite diazotrophic inoculants that could be used to supply cereal crops with nitrogen in a sustainable manner. Although diazotrophic bacteria possess diverse oxygen tolerance mechanisms, most require a sub 21% oxygen environment to achieve optimal stability and function of the N-fixing catalyst nitrogenase. Consequently, assessment of N fixation is routinely carried out on “free-living” bacteria grown in the absence of a host plant and such experiments may not accurately divulge activity in the rhizosphere where the availability and forms of nutrients such as carbon and N, which are key regulators of N fixation, may vary widely. Here, we present a modified in situ acetylene reduction assay (ARA), utilizing the model cereal barley as a host to comparatively assess nitrogenase activity in diazotrophic bacteria. The assay is rapid, highly reproducible, applicable to a broad range of diazotrophs, and can be performed with simple equipment commonly found in most laboratories that investigate plant-microbe interactions. Thus, the assay could serve as a first point of order for high-throughput identification of elite plant-associative diazotrophs.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00207713-46-3-802
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00221287-84-1-188
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copbio.2019.09.024
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10658-007-9171-3
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00221287-86-1-39
- https://doi.org//10.1042/bst20180342
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13199-016-0397-8
- https://doi.org//10.1099/ijs.0.050609-0
- https://doi.org//10.1128/aem.02430-07
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nprot.2006.24
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0005-2728(72)90265-4
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-94-011-7113-7_14
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0155979
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00207713-38-1-89
- https://doi.org//10.1094/mpmi.1998.11.1.71
- https://doi.org//10.1094/mpmi.1999.12.9.813
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1574-6968.1991.tb04502.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copbio.2015.01.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s1369-5266(03)00038-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mib.2014.02.002
- https://doi.org//10.1101/347930
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.43.8.1185
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1613358113
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41396-020-00835-4
- https://doi.org//10.1094/mpmi.2002.15.3.233
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-3-7091-1254-0_3
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00221287-87-2-343
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2958.1991.tb00738.x
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2164-11-S5-S7
- https://doi.org//10.1002/cbic.201900784
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.m301992200
- https://doi.org//10.1093/emboj/19.22.6041
- https://doi.org//10.1139/m91-092
- https://doi.org//10.1128/jb.181.8.2655-2658.1999
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mib.2005.02.011
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00221287-140-10-2797
- https://doi.org//10.1093/oxfordjournals.aob.a087538
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0168-6496(03)00108-9
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2018.01794
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41564-019-0631-2
- https://doi.org//10.1128/aem.66.9.4037-4044.2000
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.07.003
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0378-1119(94)90324-7
- https://doi.org//10.1139/m78-160
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1574-6968.2009.01556.x
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pbio.2006352
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0016765
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.108.129288
CC BY 4.0