Image5_Expression Profile and Molecular Basis of Cyclin-Dependent Kinases Regulatory Subunit 2 in Endometrial Carcinoma Detected by Diversified Methods.TIF
Purpose: Our purpose was to systematically appraise the clinicopathological significance and explore the molecular bases of CKS2 in endometrial carcinoma.
Patients and Methods: We measured the clinicopathological significance of CKS2 using diverse methods of public RNA-seq, microarrays, and in-house tissue microarrays to investigate the molecular basis of CKS2 in endometrial carcinoma through upstream transcriptional analysis, immune infiltration correlation analysis, and co-expression analysis.
Results: Both the analysis for public RNA-seq plus the microarray data and in-house tissue microarray confirmed the significant overexpression of CKS2 in a total of 1,021 endometrial carcinoma samples compared with 279 non-cancer endometrium samples (SMD = 2.10, 95% CI = 0.72–3.48). The upregulated CKS2 was significantly related to the lymph node metastasis and advanced clinical grade of endometrial carcinoma patients (p < 0.001). Mutation types such as amplification and mRNA occurred with high frequency in the CKS2 gene in endometrial carcinoma patients. A series of miRNAs and transcription factors, such as hsa-miR-26a, hsa-miR-130a, hsa-miR-30, E2F4, MAX, and GABPA, were predicted to regulate the transcription and expression of CKS2. Significant links were found between CKS2 expression and the infiltration level of B cells, CD4+ T cells, and neutrophils in endometrial carcinoma. CKS2-coexpressed genes were actively involved in pathways such as the mitotic cell cycle process, PID aurora B pathway, and prolactin signaling pathway.
Conclusion: The overexpressed CKS2 showed positive correlations with the clinical progression of endometrial carcinoma and was associated with various cancer-related biological processes and pathways, showing potential as a promising clinical biomarker for endometrial carcinoma.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3322/caac.21660
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ygyno.2009.03.039
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736%2822%2900323-3
- https://doi.org//10.3892/ol.2019.10550
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.2012.48.2596
- https://doi.org//10.3390/jcm10143094
- https://doi.org//10.1136/ijgc-2021-002692
- https://doi.org//10.2147/CMAR.S316211
- https://doi.org//10.1111/dote.12013
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1440-1681.12890
- https://doi.org//10.1042/BSR20200525
- https://doi.org//10.26355/eurrev_201904_17681
- https://doi.org//10.1111/liv.12014
- https://doi.org//10.3892/or.2014.3062
- https://doi.org//10.1159/000494875
- https://doi.org//10.7717/peerj.10458
- https://doi.org//10.1080/21655979.2021.1952791
- https://doi.org//10.1089/cbr.2020.3943
- https://doi.org//10.12659/MSM.928523
- https://doi.org//10.7717/peerj.10126
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jop.13116
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2019/8964015
- https://doi.org//10.1038/onc.2014.137
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1102434108