Image3_Study on the Relationship of Root Morphology and Phosphorus Absorption Efficiency With Phosphorus Uptake Capacity in 235 Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) Germplasms.TIF
Peanut (Arachis hypogaea L.) is a significant oil and protein crop. Its yields greatly depend on the availability of phosphorus (P). Root morphology and P absorption efficiency are important factors affecting the P uptake capacity, but their relationships in peanuts are rarely reported. Here, we report the effect of root morphology and P absorption efficiency on the P uptake capacity in peanuts using 235 germplasms. In this work, we use the P uptake rate per plant to reflect the P uptake capacity. The P uptake capacity was significantly increased after low-P treatment and showed great differences among the germplasms. The germplasms with higher P absorption efficiency and a well-developed root system have higher P uptake capacity. Under both P conditions, the P absorption efficiency plays more important roles than root morphology in P uptake capacity, and the P uptake rate per unit root dry weight and the P uptake rate per unit root surface area contributed the most. Root morphology contributes more to the P uptake capacity under low-P treatment than under sufficient-P conditions, and root surface area contributed the most. Forty-eight germplasms with higher P uptake capacity were screened, and they had three different uptake strategies under low-P treatment. These findings indicated that low-P stress induces root growth and improves the P absorption efficiency of peanuts to ensure the plant gets enough P; provides new insights into the relationship between the P uptake capacity, P absorption efficiency, and root morphology; and furnishes important evaluation indexes for high P-efficient germplasm selection.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s42729-021-00418-y
- https://doi.org//10.1023/b%3Aplso.0000037051.16411.03
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.18.01097
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.54.4.564
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2018.01614
- https://doi.org//10.34133/2020/1925495
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jgg.2016.11.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736%2800%2973482-9
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11104-020-04584-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tree.2012.07.002
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.111.175240
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13562-020-00586-5
- https://doi.org//10.2135/cropsci1985.0011183X002500010046x
- https://doi.org//10.3146/i0095-3679-24-1-1
- https://doi.org//10.1080/01904167.2014.936613
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12870-014-0334-z
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11104-011-0909-5
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2019.01158
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2018.00686
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jipb.13090
- https://doi.org//10.1071/FP12242
- https://doi.org//10.1270/jsbbs.17083
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-arplant-050213-035949
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nph.16129
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11104-004-1096-4
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.01939
- https://doi.org//10.18805/lr-3927
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.fcr.2017.11.017
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.fcr.2013.12.016
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1161-0301%2800%2900099-X
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nph.13363
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0003-2670%2800%2988444-5
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jxb/erw115
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2016.00408
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11104-006-9099-y
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nph.14967
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.eja.2016.02.003
- https://doi.org//10.5958/0975-6906.2015.00057.7
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s42729-021-00436-w
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms19071914
- https://doi.org//10.1104/pp.112.196345
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12284-016-0102-9
- https://doi.org//10.1111/pbi.13414
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.semcdb.2017.06.013
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.plantsci.2010.06.007
- https://doi.org//10.1093/aob/mcq029
- https://doi.org//10.1093/aobpla/plv097
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11104-017-3214-0
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nph.15833
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1439-0523.2001.00561.x
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpls.2017.00614
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.geoderma.2021.115261
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jipb.12601