Image2_Quercetin Inhibits Tumorigenesis of Colorectal Cancer Through Downregulation of hsa_circ_0006990.JPEG
Quercetin can significantly inhibit the progression of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, its specific mechanism remains largely unclear. In this study, we aimed to explore the correlation among quercetin, tumour-associated macrophages (TAMs) and circular RNAs (circRNAs) in the progression of CRC and to present a novel strategy for the treatment of CRC. In this study, we revealed that quercetin could suppress the autophagy of M2-TAMs and induced their differentiation into M1-TAMs, by which quercetin significantly reversed the inhibition of M2-TAMS on CRC cell apoptosis and the promotion of M2-TAMS on CRC cell proliferation. Moreover, quercetin could promote the expression of downregulated hsa_circ_0006990 in CRC cells co-cultured with M2-TAMs, and the overexpression of hsa_circ_0006990 significantly reversed the anti-tumour effect of quercetin on CRC. Furthermore, we found quercetin can notably suppress the progression of CRC via mediation of the hsa_circ_0006990/miR-132-3p/MUC13 axis. In conclusion, our results suggested that quercetin inhibits the tumorigenesis of CRC via inhibiting the polarisation of M2 macrophages and downregulating hsa_circ_0006990. Our study provides useful insights for those exploring new methods of treating CRC.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.bjc.6602901
- https://doi.org//10.1016/B978-0-12-407704-1.00001-4
- https://doi.org//10.4161/auto.26927
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0023317
- https://doi.org//10.1096/fasebj.7.1.7678559
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.immuni.2005.02.003
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature01322
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa041869
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.canlet.2017.11.040
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ijc.29210
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s13059-014-0409-z
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncomms1239
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.sjbs.2018.04.015
- https://doi.org//10.1261/rna.035667.112
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopha.2019.108611
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10495-016-1334-2
- https://doi.org//10.1089/cbr.2018.2749
- https://doi.org//10.2217/nnm-2021-0070
- https://doi.org//10.4196/kjpp.2017.21.2.205
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa041588
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2020.583084
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbagrm.2019.05.002
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrc1256
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.smim.2015.10.003
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2021/3905367
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2010.03.014
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.canlet.2014.10.003
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1476-4598-9-273
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13402-019-00453-z
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2016.4820
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2021/3157867
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1759-7714.13497
- https://doi.org//10.3322/caac.21660
- https://doi.org//10.21037/jgo.2018.04.01
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrgastro.2014.229
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.humpath.2006.11.020
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1756-9966-31-97
- https://doi.org//10.26355/eurrev_201804_14724
- https://doi.org//10.2147/OTT.S201731
- https://doi.org//10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-16-0360
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bib/bbw081
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.canlet.2017.10.024
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2021.12311
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ecoenv.2021.112730
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2018.06.089
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejphar.2020.173090
- https://doi.org//10.3727/096504017X14886485417426
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcp.27684
- https://doi.org//10.3748/wjg.v20.i21.6515
- https://doi.org//10.3892/ol.2016.4639