sorry, we can't preview this file
Image1_Attitudes and Practices of Immune Checkpoint Inhibitors in Chinese Patients With Cancer: A National Cross-Sectional Survey.tif
Immune-checkpoint inhibitors (ICIs) are revolutionizing the field of immuno-oncology. Side effects and tumor microenvironment currently represent the most significant obstacles to using ICIs. In this study, we conducted an extensive cross-sectional survey to investigate the concept and practices regarding the use of ICIs in cancer patients in China. The results provide real-world data on the adverse events (AEs) of ICIs and the factors influencing the use of ICIs. This survey was developed by the Expert Committee on Immuno-Oncology of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO-IO) and the Expert Committee on Patient Education of the Chinese Society of Clinical Oncology (CSCO-PE). The surveys were distributed using a web-based platform between November 29, 2019 and December 21, 2019. A total of 1,575 patients were included. High costs (43.9%), uncertainty about drug efficacy (41.2%), and no reimbursement from medical insurance (32.4%) were the factors that prevented the patients from using ICIs. The patients were most concerned about the onset time or effective duration of ICIs (40.3%), followed by the indications of ICIs and pre-use evaluation (33.4%). Moreover, 9.0, 57.1, 21.0, and 12.9% of the patients reported tumor disappearance, tumor volume reduction, no change in tumor volume, and increased tumor volume. Among the patients who received ICIs, 65.7% reported immune-related AEs (irAEs); 96.1% reported mild-to-moderate irAEs. Cancer patients in China had a preliminary understanding of ICIs. Yet, the number of patients treated with ICIs was small.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.2165/11594010-000000000-00000
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40425-019-0805-8
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.lungcan.2016.07.016
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdv297
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdw328
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdx225
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2019.2535
- https://doi.org//10.2147/CCID.S120877
- https://doi.org//10.1002/emmm.201100165
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40425-017-0310-x
- https://doi.org//10.1097/CAD.0000000000000921
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1470-2045(19)30728-4
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jgs.15750
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.eururo.2019.05.037
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdw326
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11912-018-0718-6
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrc3239
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40425-017-0300-z
- https://doi.org//10.1080/21645515.2016.1175694
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40425-019-0813-8
- https://doi.org//10.1200/JCO.2020.38.15_suppl.9039
- https://doi.org//10.1056/NEJMoa1809615
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cllc.2019.12.006
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.aac4255
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41375-019-0545-2
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12032-020-1340-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.chest.2018.08.1048
- https://doi.org//10.2147/OTT.S97746
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.semcancer.2019.12.003
- https://doi.org//10.1093/annonc/mdz197
- https://doi.org//10.4103/jcrt.JCRT_990_19
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12885-020-6583-3
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2019/9283860