Table_4_Can Targeting Non-Contiguous V-Regions With Paired-End Sequencing Improve 16S rRNA-Based Taxonomic Resolution of Microbiomes?: An In Silico Evaluation.xlsx
Background: Next-generation sequencing (NGS) technologies have enabled probing of microbial diversity in different environmental niches with unprecedented sequencing depth. However, due to read-length limitations of popular NGS technologies, 16S amplicon sequencing-based microbiome studies rely on targeting short stretches of the 16S rRNA gene encompassing a selection of variable (V) regions. In most cases, such a short stretch constitutes a single V-region or a couple of V-regions placed adjacent to each other on the 16S rRNA gene. Given that different V-regions have different resolving ability with respect to various taxonomic groups, selecting the optimal V-region (or a combination thereof) remains a challenge.
Methods: The accuracy of taxonomic profiles generated from sequences encompassing 1) individual V-regions, 2) adjacent V-regions, and 3) pairs of non-contiguous V-regions were assessed and compared. Subsequently, the discriminating capability of different V-regions with respect to different taxonomic lineages was assessed. The possibility of using paired-end sequencing protocols to target combinations of non-adjacent V-regions was finally evaluated with respect to the utility of such an experimental design in providing improved taxonomic resolution.
Results: Extensive validation with simulated microbiome datasets mimicking different environmental and host-associated microbiome samples suggest that targeting certain combinations of non-contiguously placed V-regions might yield better taxonomic classification accuracy compared to conventional 16S amplicon sequencing targets. This work also puts forward a novel in silico combinatorial strategy that enables creation of consensus taxonomic profiles from experiments targeting multiple pair-wise combinations of V-regions to improve accuracy in taxonomic classification.
Conclusion: The study suggests that targeting non-contiguous V-regions with paired-end sequencing can improve 16S rRNA–based taxonomic resolution of microbiomes. Furthermore, employing the novel in silico combinatorial strategy can improve taxonomic classification without any significant additional experimental costs and/or efforts. The empirical observations obtained can potentially serve as a guideline for future 16S microbiome studies, and facilitate researchers in choosing the optimal combination of V-regions for a specific experiment/sampled environment.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1186/2049-2618-1-31
- https://doi.org//10.1128/mSystems.00191-16
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.02772-10
- https://doi.org//10.1186/2049-2618-2-29
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nmeth.3869
- https://doi.org//10.1128/CMR.17.4.840-862.2004
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkt1244
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2180-12-276
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12864-015-2194-9
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0114814
- https://doi.org//10.1186/2049-2618-2-6
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncomms7528
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40168-017-0396-x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ismej.2011.191
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mimet.2010.08.008
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature11234
- https://doi.org//10.1093/dnares/dsu013
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2012/251364
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nbt.2198
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.heliyon.2016.e00170
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ctg.2017.58
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JCM.42.7.3023-3029.2004
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41396-019-0427-7
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0148347
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-018-23296-4
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JCM.43.12.6123-6125.2005
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0011840
- https://doi.org//10.1186/2049-2618-2-18
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.02206-14
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.01541-09
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.67.8.3557-3563.2001
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ismej.2011.208
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.00062-07
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1574-6941.12228
- https://doi.org//10.1093/dnares/dsy045
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.09.228
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bioinformatics/btt593
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Gene and Molecular Therapy
- Biomarkers
- Genetics
- Genetically Modified Animals
- Developmental Genetics (incl. Sex Determination)
- Epigenetics (incl. Genome Methylation and Epigenomics)
- Gene Expression (incl. Microarray and other genome-wide approaches)
- Livestock Cloning
- Genome Structure and Regulation
- Genetic Engineering
- Genomics