Table_3_Reducing Objectification Could Tackle Stigma in the COVID-19 Pandemic: Evidence From China.DOCX
Stigmatization associated with the coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19) is expected to be a complex issue and to extend into the later phases of the pandemic, which impairs social cohesion and relevant individuals' well-being. Identifying contributing factors and learning their roles in the stigmatization process may help tackle the problem. This study quantitatively assessed the severity of stigmatization against three different groups of people: people from major COVID-19 outbreak sites, those who had been quarantined, and healthcare workers; explored the factors associated with stigmatization within the frameworks of self-categorization theory and core social motives; and proposed solutions to resolve stigma. The cross-sectional online survey was carried out between April 21 and May 7, 2020, using a convenience sample, which yielded 1,388 valid responses. Employing data analysis methods like multivariate linear regression and moderation analysis, this study yields some main findings: (1) those from major COVID-19 outbreak sites received the highest level of stigma; (2) factors most closely associated with stigmatization, in descending order, are objectification and epidemic proximity in an autonomic aspect and fear of contracting COVID-19 in a controllable aspect; and (3) superordinate categorization is a buffering moderator in objectification–stigmatization relationship. These findings are important for further understanding COVID-19-related stigma, and they can be utilized to develop strategies to fight against relevant discrimination and bias. Specifically, reinforcing superordinate categorization by cultivating common in-group identity, such as volunteering and donating for containment of the pandemic, could reduce objectification and, thus, alleviate stigma.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00048670801961115
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1473-3099%2820%2930498-9
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41562-020-0884-z
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-9280.1990.tb00226.x
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.71.2.262
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajp.2021.102584
- https://doi.org//10.1080/13557858.2020.1830035
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736%2820%2930792-3
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.5
- https://doi.org//10.1080/14792779343000004
- https://doi.org//10.1037/1089-2699.4.1.98
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00049539208260146
- https://doi.org//10.1136/pgmj.45.527.642
- https://doi.org//10.1111/bjso.12049
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0065-2601%2808%2960016-7
- https://doi.org//10.1207/s15327957pspr1003_4
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph17082933
- https://doi.org//10.5395/rde.2013.38.1.52
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.33.5.508
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00223891.2013.819511
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.socscimed.2005.04.010
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0030222815569440
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pntd.0005845
- https://doi.org//10.1002/9780470773963.ch16
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0033-295X.106.4.835
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-6494.1967.tb01454.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/B978-0-12-394281-4.00001-5
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0963721411402596
- https://doi.org//10.1002/acp.3473
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0022-1031%2891%2990031-Z
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1752-4458-2-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S2212-5671%2815%2900123-9
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.56.1.60
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Applied Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology
- Organizational Behavioral Psychology
- Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology
- Gender Psychology
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
- Industrial and Organisational Psychology
- Psychology not elsewhere classified