Table_2_Personalized Disease Monitoring in Pediatric Onset Multiple Sclerosis Using the Saliva Free Light Chain Test.doc
Development of new safe methods of monitoring disease activity in the pediatric onset multiple sclerosis (POMS) is a challenging task, especially when trying to refrain from frequent MRI usage. In our recent study, the saliva immunoglobulin free light chains (FLC) were suggested as biomarkers to discriminate between remission and active MS in adults.
ObjectivesTo assess utility of saliva FLC measurements for monitoring disease activity in POMS.
MethodsWe used semiquantitative Western blot analysis to detect immunoreactive FLC monomers and dimers and to calculate the intensity of their bands. Statistical tests included Firth logistic regression analysis suitable for small sample sizes, and Spearman’s non-parametric correlation.
ResultsIn naive POMS patients, the saliva levels of FLC in relapse were significantly higher than those in remission. Significant correlation was found between FLC levels (monomers, dimers or both) and the load of enhanced lesions in MRI scans. FLC levels may be reduced under treatment, especially as result of corticosteroids therapy. Follow-up of individual patients showed the correspondence of changes in the FLC levels to MRI findings.
ConclusionsOur results show the potential of the non-invasive saliva FLC test, as a new tool for monitoring the disease activity in POMS.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1111/ene.13819
- https://doi.org//10.1177/135245859700300105
- https://doi.org//10.1212/wnl.59.7.1006
- https://doi.org//10.1590/S0004-282X2008000500011
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0387-7604(03)00035-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.msard.2020.102260
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12883-018-1026-3
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ana.20703
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ana.22366
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1474-4422(17)30470-2
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1474-4422(21)00247-7
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1352458520910361
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s40893-017-0022-6
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10072-004-0336-y
- https://doi.org//10.1111/ene.12327
- https://doi.org//10.3174/ajnr.A4539
- https://doi.org//10.1101/cshperspect.a028969
- https://doi.org//10.1148/radiol.2015142690
- https://doi.org//10.1148/radiol.13131669
- https://doi.org//10.1080/14737159.2019.1586535
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cei.13086
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.msard.2020.102339
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jneuroim.2010.09.002
- https://doi.org//10.1093/brain/awz144
- https://doi.org//10.2307/2336755
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1352458519871818
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2021.654942
- https://doi.org//10.1212/WNL.39.3.378
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0165-5728(89)90038-6
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0106335
- https://doi.org//10.1111/ejh.13758
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity