Table_1_Serum Metabolic Profiling of Late-Pregnant Women With Antenatal Depressive Symptoms.xlsx
Background: Antenatal depression (AD) is a major public health issue worldwide and lacks objective laboratory-based tests to support its diagnosis. Recently, small metabolic molecules have been found to play a vital role in interpreting the pathogenesis of AD. Thus, non-target metabolomics was conducted in serum.
Methods: Liquid chromatography—tandem mass spectrometry—based metabolomics platforms were used to conduct serum metabolic profiling of AD and non-antenatal depression (NAD). Orthogonal partial least squares discriminant analysis, the non-parametric Mann–Whitney U test, and Benjamini–Hochberg correction were used to identify the differential metabolites between AD and NAD groups; Spearman's correlation between the key differential metabolites and Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale (EPDS) and the stepwise logistic regression analysis was used to identify potential biomarkers.
Results: In total, 79 significant differential metabolites between AD and NAD were identified. These metabolites mainly influence amino acid metabolism and glycerophospholipid metabolism. Then, PC (16:0/16:0) and betaine were significantly positively correlated with EPDS. The simplified biomarker panel consisting of these three metabolites [betaine, PC (16:0/16:0) and succinic acid] has excellent diagnostic performance (95% confidence interval = 0.911–1.000, specificity = 95%, sensitivity = 85%) in discriminating AD and NAD.
Conclusion: The results suggested that betaine, PC (16:0/16:0), and succinic acid were potential biomarker panels, which significantly correlated with depression; and it could make for developing an objective method in future to diagnose AD.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cpr.2020.101932
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2020.03.067
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2020.07.046
- https://doi.org//10.1136/jech-2018-211819
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2020.08.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbi.2019.02.014
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41380-018-0265-4
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.ajp.2019.19070707
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31948-2
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuron.2020.06.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2020.09.054
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2018.12.075
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.physbeh.2018.11.024
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1099800414543821
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbi.2009.02.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajog.2018.12.015
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijnurstu.2010.02.005
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291716002087
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0004867418804067
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41398-018-0245-0
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41398-018-0183-x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/tp.2016.188
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41398-020-0731-z
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41398-020-01024-9
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41398-020-01038-3
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12888-019-2241-1
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2019.11.061
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nprot.2011.335
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00726-020-02893-6
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11306-016-1050-5
- https://doi.org//10.1021/ac051437y
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.exer.2020.108070
- https://doi.org//10.2147/DMSO.S251034
- https://doi.org//10.1039/C9RA06607A
- https://doi.org//10.2147/DDDT.S229145
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41380-020-0645-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbr.2016.04.032
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbr.2016.11.035
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2016.02.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.metabol.2019.04.002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00216-016-9768-5
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.lfs.2020.117443
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.RA118.005232
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep37574
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10545-010-9088-4
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms20051149
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbr.2017.06.012
- https://doi.org//10.1159/000504962
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41380-020-0744-2
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu11122995
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu9080815
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu10101513
- https://doi.org//10.1080/1828051X.2020.1773949
- https://doi.org//10.1002/da.22637
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0165267
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jad.2015.05.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ebiom.2019.05.062
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.2019-17319
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00577
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41380-018-0252-9
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrd.2017.16
- https://doi.org//10.1097/HRP.0000000000000183
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.canlet.2017.01.019
- https://doi.org//10.1089/ars.2011.3930
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.drudis.2016.01.016