Table_1_Revisiting the Idea That Amyloid-β Peptide Acts as an Agonist for P2X7.docx
The P2X7 receptor (P2X7) is a cell surface ligand-gated ion channel, activated by its physiological nucleotide agonist ATP and a synthetic analog (BzATP). However, it has also been suggested that there may be structurally unrelated, non-nucleotide agonists such as the amyloidogenic β peptide. Here we aimed to reassess the effect of amyloid β peptides in various in vitro cell models, namely HEK293 overexpressing human P2X7, the microglial BV-2 cell line, and BV-2 cells lacking P2X7. We measured YO-PRO-1 dye uptake in response to full-length amyloid β peptide (1–42) or the shorter amyloid β peptide (25–35) and there was a concentration-dependent increase in YO-PRO-1 dye uptake in HEK-hP2X7 cells. However, these amyloid β peptide-induced increases in YO-PRO-1 dye uptake were also identical in non-transfected HEK-293 cells. We could observe small transient increases in [Ca2+]i induced by amyloid β peptides in BV-2 cells, however these were identical in BV-2 cells lacking P2X7. Furthermore, our metabolic viability and LDH release experiments suggest no significant change in viability or cell membrane damage in HEK-hP2X7 cells. In the BV-2 cells we found that high concentrations of amyloid β peptides (1–42) and (25–35) could reduce cell viability by up to 35% but this was also seen in BV-2 cells lacking P2X7. We found no evidence of LDH release by amyloid β peptides. In summary, we found no evidence that amyloid β peptides act as agonists of P2X7 in our in vitro models. Our study raises the possibility that amyloid β peptides simply mimic features of P2X7 activation.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0093058
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jnatprod.9b00410
- https://doi.org//10.1006/mcne.2001.1054
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0197-4580(92)90065-6
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.m508125200
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.bjp.0701278
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nn1472
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.m110.200618
- https://doi.org//10.1124/mol.118.113696
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fphar.2018.00039
- https://doi.org//10.1038/382716a0
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.172.8.4987
- https://doi.org//10.1096/fj.03-0364fje
- https://doi.org//10.1084/jem.185.3.579
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0130624
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1072994
- https://doi.org//10.1385/nmm:3:3:173
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nn1805
- https://doi.org//10.1111/bph.13123
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrn3880
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0022-1759(95)00172-7
- https://doi.org//10.1523/jneurosci.2557-04.2004
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature05704
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41586-018-0718-6
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41380-018-0108-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0896-6273(93)90315-i
- https://doi.org//10.1097/01.jnen.0000240470.97295.d3
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1215165110
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nn.4018
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2013.03.079
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1002843
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1471-4159.2012.07868.x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1471-4159.2011.07210.x
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.m209478200
- https://doi.org//10.1523/jneurosci.13-04-01676.1993
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jneuroim.2003.10.014
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.0803612
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0006-3495(95)79940-4
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.272.5262.735
- https://doi.org//10.1124/mol.66.4.909
- https://doi.org//10.2174/187152712803581137
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nm1082
- https://doi.org//10.1529/biophysj.105.079186
- https://doi.org//10.1006/bbrc.1994.1209
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0076-6879(99)09015-1