Table_1_Neutrophil-to-Lymphocyte Ratio and Treatment Failure in Peritoneal Dialysis-Associated Peritonitis.pdf
Objective: We sought to explore if there is an association between neutrophil-to-lymphocyte ratio (NLR) and treatment failure in patients with peritoneal dialysis-associated peritonitis (PDAP).
Methods: Our cohort involved 337 episodes of PDAP experienced by 202 patients who were undergoing continuous ambulatory peritoneal dialysis at a single center from 1 July 2013 to 30 June 2018. The exposures were log-transformed NLR and a categorical variable grouped by the tertiles of NLR levels (T1, <3.75; T2, 3.75–6.53; and T3, >6.53) at baseline. Generalized estimating equation (GEE) and restricted cubic spline (RCS) analyses were done to determine the association between NLR and treatment failure, defined as catheter removal or all-cause mortality during therapy.
Results: After adjusting for other potential predictors, the log-transformed NLR exhibited an incremental relationship with the risk of treatment failure (odds ratio, 1.82; 95% confidence interval, 1.05–3.15). RCS analyses showed that the relationship was positively and linearly correlated (P for nonlinearity = 0.104). As a three-level categorical variable, in reference to T1, the T3 of NLR showed a 3.41-fold increased venture of treatment failure in fully adjusted model. Subgroup analyses suggested that the prognostic relevance of NLR in PDAP was particularly significant in gram-negative peritonitis.
Conclusions: A greater level of NLR at baseline was remarkably associated with a higher incidence of treatment failure among PDAP episodes regardless of other potential risk factors.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.2215/CJN.14631218
- https://doi.org//10.1681/ASN.2016010112
- https://doi.org//10.1093/ndt/gfg027
- https://doi.org//10.1681/ASN.2011121135
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ki.2010.16
- https://doi.org//10.2215/CJN.01260209
- https://doi.org//10.3747/pdi.2016.00078
- https://doi.org//10.1053/j.ajkd.2017.10.019
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nep.12828
- https://doi.org//10.2215/CJN.01010306
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12882-020-02174-0
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12967-019-1808-4
- https://doi.org//10.1159/000484177
- https://doi.org//10.5414/CN108584
- https://doi.org//10.3109/0886022X.2012.734429
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0272-6386(00)70200-9
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1523-1755.1999.00273.x
- https://doi.org//10.1093/ndt/14.8.1956
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1523-1755.1998.00032.x
- https://doi.org//10.1177/089686089801800407
- https://doi.org//10.1161/JAHA.115.001918
- https://doi.org//10.1097/MCO.0000000000000171
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajkd.2003.07.016
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0272-6386(03)00372-X
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ijc.28536
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jnci/dju124
- https://doi.org//10.3109/0886022X.2012.668741
- https://doi.org//10.1159/000488696
- https://doi.org//10.1097/MEG.0b013e32835c2af3
- https://doi.org//10.1586/erc.12.159
- https://doi.org//10.1586/14779072.2016.1154788
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10753-013-9749-1
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0896860819896134
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10096-018-3302-y
- https://doi.org//10.1053/j.ajkd.2014.02.025
- https://doi.org//10.3747/pdi.2012.00233
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ki.1997.363
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Radiology and Organ Imaging
- Foetal Development and Medicine
- Obstetrics and Gynaecology
- Primary Health Care
- Medical and Health Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Dermatology
- Emergency Medicine
- Gastroenterology and Hepatology
- Geriatrics and Gerontology
- Intensive Care
- Medical Genetics (excl. Cancer Genetics)
- Nephrology and Urology
- Nuclear Medicine
- Orthopaedics
- Otorhinolaryngology
- Pathology (excl. Oral Pathology)
- Family Care