Table_1_Long-Term Encapsulated Nitrate Supplementation Modulates Rumen Microbial Diversity and Rumen Fermentation to Reduce Methane Emission in Grazing Steers.pdf
This study investigated the long-term effects (13 months) of encapsulated nitrate supplementation (ENS) on enteric methane emissions, rumen fermentation parameters, ruminal bacteria, and diversity of archaea in grazing beef cattle. We used a total of thirty-two Nellore steers (initial BW of 197 ± 15.3 kg), 12 of which were fitted with rumen cannulas. For 13 months, the animals were maintained in 12 paddocks and fed a concentrate of ground corn, soybean meals, mineral supplements, and urea (URS) or encapsulated nitrate (EN) containing 70 g of EN/100 kg of BW (corresponding to 47 g NO3-/100 kg BW). Encapsulated nitrate supplementation resulted in similar forage, supplement and total DMI values as URS (P > 0.05), but ENS tended to increase (+48 g/d; P = 0.055) average daily weight gain. Daily reductions in methane emissions (-9.54 g or 18.5%) were observed with ENS when expressed as g of CH4/kg of forage dry matter intake (fDMI) (P = 0.037). Lower concentrations of NH3-N and a higher ruminal pH were observed in ENS groups 6 h after supplementation (P < 0.05). Total VFA rumen concentration 6 h (P = 0.009) and 12 h after supplementation with EN resulted in lower acetate concentrations in the rumen (P = 0.041). Steers supplemented with EN had a greater ruminal abundance of Bacteroides, Barnesiella, Lactobacillus, Selenomonas, Veillonella, Succinimonas, Succinivibrio, and Duganella sp. (P < 0.05), but a lower abundance of Methanobrevibacter sp. (P = 0.007). Strong negative correlations were found between daily methane emissions and Proteobacteria, Erysipelotrichaceae, Prevotellaceae, and Roseburia, Kandleria, Selenomonas, Veillonella, and Succinivibrio sp. (P < 0.05) in the rumen of ENS steers. Encapsulated nitrate is a feed additive that persistently affects enteric methane emission in grazing steers, thereby decreasing Methanobrevibacter abundance in the rumen. In addition, ENS can promote fumarate-reducer and lactate-producer bacteria, thereby reducing acetate production during rumen fermentation.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fvets.2016.00062
- https://doi.org//10.2323/jgam.46.119
- https://doi.org//10.1111/asj.12307
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.00147-09
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nmeth.f.303
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1000080107
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkt1244
- https://doi.org//10.4141/cjas61-024
- https://doi.org//10.1111/gcb.13709
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2017.00226
- https://doi.org//10.2307/4002491
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2017.01605
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1600298113
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas.2013-7084
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(61)89956-6
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.188.2.642-658.2006
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0176701
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas.2011-4209
- https://doi.org//10.1006/anae.2002.0428
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.02812-07
- https://doi.org//10.2527/1995.7382483x
- https://doi.org//10.1021/es00051a025
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4020-6133-2_3
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0103171
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12866-017-10271
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0884533611436116
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0008926
- https://doi.org//10.4141/CJAS-2014-069
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas2014-8845
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas2015-9435
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas.2017.1460
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas.2017.1461
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas1973.373837x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-013-5143-z
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10482-015-0459-6
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2105-7-371
- https://doi.org//10.5713/ajas.2014.14280
- https://doi.org//10.1079/BJN19880037
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S1751731109990620
- https://doi.org//10.14806/ej.17.1.200
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2016.01122
- https://doi.org//10.2527/2004.821179x
- https://doi.org//10.2527/jas.2014-7677
- https://doi.org//10.1071/AN09211
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.2015-10691
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1205760
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bioinformatics/btr026
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.S0022-0302(55)95006-2
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0119712
- https://doi.org//10.2527/2001.7941059x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature05414
- https://doi.org//10.1590/S1516-35982011001100039
- https://doi.org//10.1007/BF00394043
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.2011-4236
- https://doi.org//10.3168/jds.2010-3281
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep05892
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12864-015-2032-0
- https://doi.org//10.1021/ac60252a045
- https://doi.org//10.2527/1998.76123114x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-94-009-1453-7_11
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2016.00132
- https://doi.org//10.5713/ajas.15.0091
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2011.10.013