Table_1_Gene Expression Differences Between Young Adults Based on Trauma History and Post-traumatic Stress Disorder.XLSX
Background: The purpose of this study was to identify gene expression differences associated with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD) and trauma exposure (TE) in a three-group study design comprised of those with and without trauma exposure and PTSD.
Methods: We conducted gene expression and gene network analyses in a sample (n = 45) composed of female subjects of European Ancestry (EA) with PTSD, TE without PTSD, and controls.
Results: We identified 283 genes differentially expressed between PTSD-TE groups. In an independent sample of Veterans (n = 78) a small minority of these genes were also differentially expressed. We identified 7 gene network modules significantly associated with PTSD and TE (Bonferroni corrected p ≤ 0.05), which at a false discovery rate (FDR) of q ≤ 0.2, were significantly enriched for biological pathways involved in focal adhesion, neuroactive ligand receptor interaction, and immune related processes among others.
Conclusions: This study uses gene network analyses to identify significant gene modules associated with PTSD, TE, and controls. On an individual gene level, we identified a large number of differentially expressed genes between PTSD-TE groups, a minority of which were also differentially expressed in the independent sample. We also demonstrate a lack of network module preservation between PTSD and TE, suggesting that the molecular signature of PTSD and trauma are likely independent of each other. Our results provide a basis for the identification of likely disease pathways and biomarkers involved in the etiology of PTSD.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291715001981
- https://doi.org//10.1001/archpsyc.1995.03950240066012
- https://doi.org//10.1097/PSY.0b013e3181d9a80c
- https://doi.org//10.4088/JCP.v61n0713e
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12888-017-1479-8
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291710002072
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.ajp.159.10.1675
- https://doi.org//10.1001/archpsyc.1993.01820160019002
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41593-019-0447-7
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-019-12576-w
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41588-020-00767-x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11920-018-0898-7
- https://doi.org//10.1038/mp.2017.77
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature09856
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsych.2009.02.034
- https://doi.org//10.7150/ijbs.4.223
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.ajp.2017.16111286
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41593-020-00748-7
- https://doi.org//10.1002/da.20663
- https://doi.org//10.1097/NEN.0b013e3181c7e32f
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1471-4159.2003.01747.x
- https://doi.org//10.1093/hmg/ddp397
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ajmg.b.30272
- https://doi.org//10.1186/2193-9616-1-15
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0409904102
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsych.2013.05.017
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2011/328054
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.mp.4001636
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1749-6632.2009.04979.x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.mp.4001905
- https://doi.org//10.1038/mp.2015.9
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11481-015-9643-8
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2164-10-327
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1000642
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0020763
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0506580102
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15504263.2018.1439212
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1073191104269954
- https://doi.org//10.1210/jc.2005-0550
- https://doi.org//10.1037/t00742-000
- https://doi.org//10.1002/lary.20005
- https://doi.org//10.1089/omi.2006.10.555
- https://doi.org//10.1198/016214504000000683
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bioinformatics/btw535
- https://doi.org//10.1002/msb.134947
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0137671
- https://doi.org//10.1034/j.1600-0447.2000.101001046.x
- https://doi.org//10.1176/appi.ajp.161.8.1390
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2105-9-559
- https://doi.org//10.2202/1544-6115.1128
- https://doi.org//10.1523/JNEUROSCI.3136-11.2012
- https://doi.org//10.1093/bib/bbr049
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gks1066
- https://doi.org//10.1242/jcs.02714
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pcbi.1000117
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1752-0509-2-95
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbalip.2011.07.014
- https://doi.org//10.1101/458786
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1530509100
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41562-017-0189-z
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature24277
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00439-014-1473-x
- https://doi.org//10.5664/jcsm.6466
- https://doi.org//10.1038/npp.2015.266
- https://doi.org//10.1176/jnp.17.4.541
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jamapsychiatry.2016.0350
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jprot.2013.05.027
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmed.2015.00056
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2350-8-66
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M110.202853
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.chiabu.2014.01.017
- https://doi.org//10.1038/sj.mp.4001218
- https://doi.org//10.1038/npp.2017.220
- https://doi.org//10.1182/blood-2010-01-256099
- https://doi.org//10.1691/ph.2018.7339
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pbio.1000569
- https://doi.org//10.1158/0008-5472.CAN-18-3376
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fonc.2013.00174
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ncomms6177
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0049920
- https://doi.org//10.1080/20008198.2017.1353383
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pcbi.1001057