Table_1_Entrepreneurship Education and Entrepreneurial Intentions of College Students: The Mediating Role of Entrepreneurial Self-Efficacy and the Moderating Role of Entrepreneurial Competition Experience.docx
This study aims to explore effective ways to improve college students’ entrepreneurial self-efficacy and intentions through entrepreneurship education. The survey used a random sample of 804 college students in Zhejiang Province, China. The results show that: (1) In terms of the characteristics of entrepreneurial intention, there are significant differences in gender, entrepreneurial experience, entrepreneurial competition experience, and family background of self-employment. (2) There are significant differences in the characteristics of entrepreneurship education in gender, entrepreneurial competition experience, and the family background of self-employment. (3) In the relationship among entrepreneurship education, entrepreneurial self-efficacy, and entrepreneurial intention, entrepreneurship education is significantly and positively related to entrepreneurial self-efficacy and entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy is significantly and positively associated with entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy plays a complete mediating role between entrepreneurship education and entrepreneurial intention. Entrepreneurial self-efficacy also has a suppressing effect on the relationship between the two. (4) Entrepreneurial competition experience moderates the second half of the mediating effect of entrepreneurial self-efficacy. Finally, the study offers several proposals for the teaching practice of entrepreneurship education.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1108/et-04-2013-0053
- https://doi.org//10.1504/JIBED.2020.110254
- https://doi.org//10.1080/02188791.2013.822789
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0033-295X.84.2.191
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1467-8624.00273
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0021-9010.89.4.587
- https://doi.org//10.4102/ac.v16i1.352
- https://doi.org//10.5465/amr.1988.4306970
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0950422218807499
- https://doi.org//10.1142/S0218495817500066
- https://doi.org//10.1002/j.2161-1920.2015.00052.x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11187-017-9985-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusres.2006.12.016
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1540-627X.2010.00312.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0883-9026(97)00029-3
- https://doi.org//10.2139/ssrn.1604653
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijer.2016.12.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusres.2013.11.024
- https://doi.org//10.1590/1679-395159595
- https://doi.org//10.1142/S0219877004000209
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2018.01.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.annals.2009.12.003
- https://doi.org//10.1080/08985620701223080
- https://doi.org//10.1002/sej.1228
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00916
- https://doi.org//10.22146/jieb.6316
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0238162
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00472778.2021.1951280
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.joep.2015.07.004
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00166.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0883-9026(98)00033-0
- https://doi.org//10.9770/jesi.2020.8.2(27)
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11365-010-0154-z
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11365-015-0358-3
- https://doi.org//10.3390/educsci4010108
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1467-9310.00288
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S1053-4822(03)00018-4
- https://doi.org//10.3390/educsci10090257
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00036846.2015.1096006
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11365-015-0365-4
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1540-6520.2011.00471.x
- https://doi.org//10.1108/14626001011088714
- https://doi.org//10.1080/03075079.2016.1177716
- https://doi.org//10.1108/02610151011024493
- https://doi.org//10.5465/amle.2012.0293
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00343409412331348386
- https://doi.org//10.9770/jesi.2020.8.1(49)
- https://doi.org//10.1111/jsbm.12025
- https://doi.org//10.1515/erj-2018-0215
- https://doi.org//10.1080/09654313.2012.722960
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0883-9026(02)00114-3
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2020.01209
- https://doi.org//10.17323/1814-9545-2015-3-171-207
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusvent.2006.05.002
- https://doi.org//10.1108/ET-06-2014-0070
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1540-6520.2009.00321.x
- https://doi.org//10.15678/EBER.2019.070401
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11187-004-6837-5
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11187-007-9074-x
- https://doi.org//10.3390/educsci4040247
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02048
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e04922
- https://doi.org//10.1108/ET-11-2018-0234
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0266242619831170
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1540-6520.2007.00179.x
- https://doi.org//10.1108/ET-01-2013-0001
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11365-012-0246-z
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2021.643184
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Applied Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology
- Organizational Behavioral Psychology
- Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology
- Gender Psychology
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
- Industrial and Organisational Psychology
- Psychology not elsewhere classified
CC BY 4.0