Table_1_Arginine 37 of Glycine Linker Dictates Regulatory Function of HapR.docx
HapR is designated as a high cell density quorum sensing master regulatory protein of Vibrio cholerae. It is a member of the TetR family protein and functions both as an activator and a repressor by directly communicating with cognate promoters, thus controlling the expression of a plethora of genes in a density-dependent manner. Molecular insights reveal the domain architecture and further unveil the significance of a cross talk between the DNA binding domain and the dimerization domain for the functionality of the wild-type protein. The DNA binding domain is made up of three α-helices, where a helix-turn-helix motif spans between the helices α2 and α3. The essentiality of the glycine-rich linker linking helices α1 and α2 came into prominence while unraveling the molecular basis of a natural non-functional variant of HapR. Subsequently, the importance of linker length was demonstrated. The present study, involving a series of biochemical analyses coupled with molecular dynamics simulation, has illustrated the indispensability of a critical arginine within the linker at position 37 contributing to HapR–DNA binding activity.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.68.11.5773-5778.2002
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.5.2.310
- https://doi.org//10.1128/IAI.69.10.6549-6553.2001
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00981-06
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S2214-109X(18)30230-4
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkr663
- https://doi.org//10.1107/S2053230X18006519
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.01807-06
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M110.209346
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00374-13
- https://doi.org//10.1021/ct700301q
- https://doi.org//10.1103/PhysRevA.31.1695
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1348-0421.1986.tb03037.x
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.02804-06
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.M109.100248
- https://doi.org//10.1046/j.1365-2958.2002.03229.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2004.06.009
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00834-06
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05693.x
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00948-09
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.21256
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-genet-102108-134304
- https://doi.org//10.1063/1.447334
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4614-9233-7_14
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nchembio.2336
- https://doi.org//10.1063/1.328693
- https://doi.org//10.1093/hmg/ddp303
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.20084
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.gene.2005.10.031
- https://doi.org//10.1002/pro.2206
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.05339-11
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00438-014-0878-5
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0076033
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.0804052
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkp121
- https://doi.org//10.1093/nar/gkp287
- https://doi.org//10.1093/emboj/16.8.2043
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0966-842X(03)00152-5
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcc.20035
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1758-2229.2010.00212.x
- https://doi.org//10.1128/jvi.79.7.4533-4539.2005
- https://doi.org//10.1101/gad.13.10.1263
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1218039110
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2958.2004.04154.x
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.052694299