Table_1_A Fucosylated Glycopeptide as a Candidate Biomarker for Early Diagnosis of NASH Hepatocellular Carcinoma Using a Stepped HCD Method and PRM Evaluation.xlsx
Aberrant specific N-glycosylation, especially the increase in fucosylation on specific peptide sites of serum proteins have been investigated as potential markers for diagnosis of nonalcoholic steatohepatitis (NASH)-related HCC. We have combined a workflow involving broad scale marker discovery in serum followed by targeted marker evaluation of these fucosylated glycopeptides. This workflow involved an LC-Stepped HCD-DDA-MS/MS method coupled with offline peptide fractionation for large-scale identification of N-glycopeptides directly from pooled serum samples (each n=10) as well as differential determination of N-glycosylation changes between disease states. We then evaluated the fucosylation level of the glycoprotein ceruloplasmin among 62 patient samples (35 cirrhosis, 27 early-stage NASH HCC) by LC-Stepped HCD-PRM-MS/MS to quantitatively analyze 18 targeted glycopeptides. Of these targets, we found the ratio of fucosylation of a tri-antennary glycopeptide from site N762, involving N762_ HexNAc(5)Hex(6)Fuc(2)NeuAc(3) (P=0.0486), increased significantly from cirrhosis to early HCC. This fucosylation ratio of a tri-antennary glycopeptide in CERU could be a potential biomarker for further validation in a larger sample set and could be a promising candidate for early detection of NASH HCC.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41575-019-0186-y
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1756283X10385964
- https://doi.org//10.1053/j.gastro.2018.01.064
- https://doi.org//10.1158/1541-7786.mcr-21-0348
- https://doi.org//10.1158/1055-9965.epi-20-0005
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00068
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-019-09222-w
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b01145
- https://doi.org//10.1074/mcp.M600176-MCP200
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nbt.3403
- https://doi.org//10.1074/mcp.RA119.001791
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.9b00191
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.6b00429
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mas.20269
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00024
- https://doi.org//10.1021/pr500043k
- https://doi.org//10.1021/ac201676a
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.analchem.9b03761
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mas.21707
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.0c00270
- https://doi.org//10.1074/mcp.M112.023259
- https://doi.org//10.1021/pr5005482
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cgh.2018.05.039
- https://doi.org//10.1111/apt.15917
- https://doi.org//10.6004/jnccn.2018.7105
- https://doi.org//10.1002/hep.29913
- https://doi.org//10.1053/j.gastro.2018.11.020
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.1c00175
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.analchem.0c00420
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.8b00654
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mas.21583
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.jproteome.5b00792
- https://doi.org//10.1021/pr500128t
- https://doi.org//10.1021/pr800752c
- https://doi.org//10.1021/pr050328x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijms.2017.09.002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13361-017-1701-4
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.analchem.7b03641
- https://doi.org//10.1039/c6mb00559d