Table_11_Bacillus subtilis BS-15 Effectively Improves Plantaricin Production and the Regulatory Biosynthesis in Lactiplantibacillus plantarum RX-8.XLSX
Plantaricin is a broad-spectrum bacteriocin produced by Lactiplantibacillus plantarum with significant food industry application potential. It was found that the plantaricin production of L. plantarum RX-8 was enhanced when co-culturing with Bacillus subtilis BS-15. This study, therefore, set out to explore how B. subtilis BS-15 induces biosynthesis of plantaricin. The effect of co-culturing with B. subtilis BS-15 on cell growth, plantaricin production, quorum-sensing (QS) signal molecule PlnA/autoinducer-2 (AI-2) secretion, as well as plantaricin biosynthesis gene cluster and AI-2 synthesis-associated gene expression, was investigated in bacteriocin-producer L. plantarum RX-8. When L. plantarum RX-8 and B. subtilis BS-15 were co-inoculated in Man–Rogosa–Sharp (MRS) for 20 h at an inoculum ratio of 1:1 (106:106 CFU/ml), the greatest plantaricin output (2,048 AU/ml) was obtained, rising by 32-fold compared with the monoculture of L. plantarum RX-8. Additionally, co-culture increased PlnA-inducing activity and AI-2 activity by 8- and 1.14-fold, respectively, over monoculture. RT-qPCR findings generated every 4 h (4–32 h) demonstrated that B. subtilis BS-15 remarkably improved the transcription of plnABCD and plnEF, and increased pfs and luxS transcription, even when using 200 mM D-ribose, a kind of AI-2 inhibitor. Based on the above findings, co-culturing with B. subtilis BS-15 as an environmental stimulus could activate the plantaricin induction via the PlnA-mediated intraspecies QS system and the AI-2-mediated interspecies QS system. Moreover, the inducing effect of PlnA and AI-2 in co-culture was independent. Differential proteomics analysis of B. subtilis BS-15 in co-culture indicated that bacteriocin-inducing regulatory mechanism may be related to flagellar assembly, peptidoglycan biosynthesis, anaerobic respiration, glycine cleavage system, or thiamin pyrophosphate biosynthesis.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00141-20
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbiotec.2017.07.009
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.01255-10
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-016-7486-8
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.foodres.2014.07.041
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.resmic.2009.04.006
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.peptides.2009.05.014
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13213-014-0817-z
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2018.02952
- https://doi.org//10.2183/pjab.84.246
- https://doi.org//10.1099/mic.0.28124-0
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijerph16061017
- https://doi.org//10.1002/fsn3.1428
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00203-003-0606-8
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.fm.2012.08.009
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijfoodmicro.2008.12.033
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.foodcont.2011.08.015
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.idairyj.2013.08.009
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12223-021-00890-0
- https://doi.org//10.1111/mmi.14709
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nyas.14300
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1005443
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-017-06578-1
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.188.5.1721-1732.2006
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.fm.2006.09.003
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12275-016-6345-8
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.00113-08
- https://doi.org//10.1556/amicr.49.2002.2-3.15
- https://doi.org//10.3390/microorganisms8050639
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10295-008-0317-x
- https://doi.org//10.1099/mic.0.2007/012831-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ram.2017.04.011
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2958.2007.05896.x
- https://doi.org//10.1093/gbe/evp042
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.27332
- https://doi.org//10.1039/D0FO01435D
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-021-11218-w
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.foodchem.2014.05.034