Table1_The Abcc6a Knockout Zebrafish Model as a Novel Tool for Drug Screening for Pseudoxanthoma Elasticum.DOCX
Pseudoxanthoma elasticum (PXE) is a multisystem ectopic mineralization disorder caused by pathogenic variants in the ABCC6 gene. Though complications of the disease can be treated, PXE itself remains currently intractable. A strategy for rapid and cost-effective discovery of therapeutic drugs would be to perform chemical compound screening using zebrafish, but this approach remains to be validated for PXE. In this paper, we validate a stable CRISPR/Cas9 abcc6a knockout zebrafish model–which has spinal column hypermineralization as its primary phenotypic feature–as a model system for compound screening in ectopic mineralization. We evaluated the anti-mineralization potential of five compounds, which had (anecdotal) positive effects reported in Abcc6 knockout mice and/or PXE patients. Abcc6a knockout zebrafish larvae were treated from 3 to 10 days post-fertilization with vitamin K1, sodium thiosulfate, etidronate, alendronate or magnesium citrate and compared to matching controls. Following alizarin red S staining, alterations in notochord sheath mineralization were semiquantified and found to largely congrue with the originally reported outcomes. Our results demonstrate that the use of this abcc6a knockout zebrafish model is a validated and promising strategy for drug discovery against ectopic mineralization.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1242/dmm.015693
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.atherosclerosis.2019.10.004
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jdermsci.2013.12.008
- https://doi.org//10.4161/cc.10.11.15681
- https://doi.org//10.1002/acn3.703
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms21155429
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10695-015-0043-z
- https://doi.org//10.1093/hmg/ddi183
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00109-010-0596-3
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00109-011-0782-y
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature12111
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1009219107
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jbmr.5650101008
- https://doi.org//10.4161/cc.10.4.14862
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1600-0625.2012.01553.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejpb.2020.03.007
- https://doi.org//10.18632/oncotarget.16687
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jacc.2017.12.062
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cts.12057
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1752-8062.2011.00390.x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejphar.2019.172773
- https://doi.org//10.1038/jid.2008.391
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0089268
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajpath.2012.12.037
- https://doi.org//10.18632/oncotarget.10738
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15384101.2015.1007809
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10067-020-05523-4
- https://doi.org//10.1111/ced.13782
- https://doi.org//10.1242/dev.113811
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15384101.2015.1024585
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajhg.2011.11.020
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fgene.2012.00302
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms20092142
- https://doi.org//10.1111/bjd.18632
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bone.2011.01.003
- https://doi.org//10.1111/nep.13081
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ajpath.2017.02.009
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11914-003-0008-5
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0240970
- https://doi.org//10.1172/JCI118722
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jaad.2019.02.055
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nmeth.2089
- https://doi.org//10.3390/ijms22010278
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pgen.1008884
- https://doi.org//10.1161/ATVBAHA.117.309182
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.kint.2019.09.034
- https://doi.org//10.3945/an.111.001628
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cellsig.2018.12.009
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jid.2018.06.183
- https://doi.org//10.1038/labinvest.2010.68
- https://doi.org//10.3390/nu12102909
- https://doi.org//10.1111/ddg.14191
- https://doi.org//10.3233/JND-190389
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jinorgbio.2020.111269