Data_Sheet_2_The Relation Between Consumers' Frontal Alpha Asymmetry, Attitude, and Investment Decision.docx
The frontal alpha asymmetry (FAA) is a neurophysiological measure of motivation and preference. Despite the FAA is associated to commercial pleasantness, conflicting evidence emerged in the literature regarding its relationship with behavior. To study the association between FAA and consumers' decision, we manipulated a commercial script to elicit diverse consumers' attitudes and decisions and to evaluate whether the FAA score is associated to their final investment. A little informative script (S1) was used to polarize consumers' attitudes and investments toward unfavorable scores, while a more personalized message (S2) to elicit in customers a favorable attitude and higher investments. Twenty-one participants listened to the scripts, and their FAA, attitude, and monetary investment were measured. In S1, the FAA did not correlate with neither attitude nor the investment decision, while a robust negative correlation between these variables was found in S2. No other peripheral body and neural measures associated with attitude or final decision. Our data suggest that the FAA correlates with attitude and decision, when a commercial script is customized and provides an adequate information, likely leading the consumer to a more reasoned and planned decision-making process. When facilitating a favorable attitude toward an offer, the negative correlation of FAA and behavior may reflect the involvement of a control system, whose role is to monitor and govern possible conflicts between approach and avoidance motivations. This observation provides additional indication on the value of FAA as a marker of consumer behaviors, and how it could be affected by experimental and contextual bias.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2004.03.007
- https://doi.org//10.1080/09599916.2019.1687572
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2011.09.004
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00913367.2017.1339368
- https://doi.org//10.1002/wcc.234
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0170840616655483
- https://doi.org//10.3791/55872
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2019/1976847
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1469-8986.00011
- https://doi.org//10.1162/jocn.2008.21020
- https://doi.org//10.1080/00913367.2001.10673648
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.005
- https://doi.org//10.31234/osf.io/s56mk
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jneumeth.2003.10.009
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10548-006-0011-0
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnbeh.2018.00166
- https://doi.org//10.1111/psyp.12910
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.elerap.2018.03.007
- https://doi.org//10.1108/02634500410525887
- https://doi.org//10.1108/ejm-12-2016-0881
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mar.4220090503
- https://doi.org//10.1002/wcs.1485
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17588928.2019.1700222
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2009.08.010
- https://doi.org//10.1007/bf00992338
- https://doi.org//10.3758/s13428-018-01190-1
- https://doi.org//10.1111/psyp.12852
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.tics.2012.10.007
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01561
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1469-8986.3520162
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10705511.2016.1186549
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-019-41636-w
- https://doi.org//10.1080/1357650x.2018.1543314
- https://doi.org//10.1080/03637751.2014.990472
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0028-3932(71)90067-4
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2018.00138
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0029949
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11199-012-0247-y
- https://doi.org//10.1198/000313001300339950
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2011/879716
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.sbspro.2011.09.067
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2014.00192
- https://doi.org//10.1037/met0000100
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10548-009-0127-0
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2014/912981
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11517-011-0747-x
- https://doi.org//10.3758/s13423-017-1323-7
- https://doi.org//10.3758/s13423-017-1343-3
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jama.2013.281053
- https://doi.org//10.1080/08874417.2007.11645949
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2018.08.007
- https://doi.org//10.1080/15427609.2017.1370966
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Radiology and Organ Imaging
- Decision Making
- Clinical Nursing: Tertiary (Rehabilitative)
- Image Processing
- Autonomic Nervous System
- Cellular Nervous System
- Biological Engineering
- Sensory Systems
- Central Nervous System
- Neuroscience
- Endocrinology
- Artificial Intelligence and Image Processing
- Signal Processing
- Rehabilitation Engineering
- Biomedical Engineering not elsewhere classified
- Stem Cells
- Neurogenetics
- Developmental Biology