Data_Sheet_1_Mindfulness Is Associated With Lower Stress and Higher Work Engagement in a Large Sample of MOOC Participants.docx
Objective: This study aimed to understand the associations between mindfulness, perceived stress, and work engagement in a very large sample of English-speaking adults, from 130 different countries. It also aimed to assess participants' self-reported changes following a 6-week mindfulness massive open online course (MOOC).
Methods: Participants in the 6-week MOOC were invited to complete pre-post online surveys. Cross-sectional associations were assessed using univariate linear models, followed by structural equation models to test mediation pathways in baseline data (N = 16,697). Self-reported changes in mindfulness, stress and engagement following training were assessed using paired t-tests (n = 2,105).
Results: Each standard deviation unit increase in mindfulness was associated with a 0.52 standard deviation unit decrease in perceived stress, and with 0.06 standard deviation unit increment in work engagement. 73% of the influence of mindfulness on engagement was direct. Following the mindfulness MOOC, participants reported higher mindfulness (d = 1.16), reduced perceived stress (d = 1.00) and a small improvement in work engagement (d = 0.29).
Conclusions: Mindfulness was associated with lower perceived stress and higher work engagement in both cross-sectional and longitudinal analyses. These findings support mindfulness as a potentially protective and modifiable personal resource. The MOOC format offers a low cost, highly accessible means for extending the reach and potential benefits of mindfulness training to large numbers of people.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jvb.2011.09.002
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0096-3445.130.2.224
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12906-015-0823-0
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0021886307311470
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.leaqua.2005.03.001
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jclp.21865
- https://doi.org//10.1037/ocp0000056
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-031413-091235
- https://doi.org//10.1080/10253890.2018.1531845
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-016-0643-4
- https://doi.org//10.1037/ocp0000146
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2012/515874
- https://doi.org//10.1093/clipsy.bph077
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jclp.20855
- https://doi.org//10.1348/135910710X501683
- https://doi.org//10.1037/0022-3514.84.4.822
- https://doi.org//10.1097/JOM.0000000000001108
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10865-007-9130-7
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jclp.20555
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-017-0856-1
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cpr.2009.06.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cpr.2010.11.003
- https://doi.org//10.1089/acm.2008.0495
- https://doi.org//10.1001/jama.298.14.1685
- https://doi.org//10.2307/2136404
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102857
- https://doi.org//10.1002/smi.2845
- https://doi.org//10.1093/occmed/kqn124
- https://doi.org//10.1017/S0033291716003317
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0963721414547415
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0018726713487753
- https://doi.org//10.1111/bjop.12338
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17439884.2013.878352
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41539-019-0042-4
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jbusres.2015.12.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.concog.2016.01.005
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0149206313475815
- https://doi.org//10.1177/2470547017711912
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0187727
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.heliyon.2020.e03699
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0149206315617003
- https://doi.org//10.1002/smi.1417
- https://doi.org//10.5334/jime.428
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0165-0327%2802%2900101-5
- https://doi.org//10.1136/bmjopen-2017-017858
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cpr.2013.05.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.explore.2021.04.004.
- https://doi.org//10.4102/sajip.v42i1.1366
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2013.00863
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jvb.2013.01.012
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01002
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fpsyg.2019.02928
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-021-01663-z.
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12529-014-9448-9
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnins.2013.00008
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-015-0388-5
- https://doi.org//10.1037/a0035150
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0146167220986310.
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12160-013-9490-x
- https://doi.org//10.1080/01587910500081269
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0236562
- https://doi.org//10.1177/2515245920917961
- https://doi.org//10.1136/bmjopen-2017-018837
- https://doi.org//10.18637/jss.v048.i02
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0013164405282471
- https://doi.org//10.1023/A%3A1015630930326
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10902-008-9100-y
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jclp.20491
- https://doi.org//10.1111/2047-3095.12025
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cpr.2016.03.009
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-020-01319-4
- https://doi.org//10.1109/TLT.2016.2633268
- https://doi.org//10.1093/scan/nsv066
- https://doi.org//10.2196/jmir.7487
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-020-01328-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.paid.2005.11.025
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jvb.2008.11.003
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12671-016-0526-8
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Applied Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology
- Organizational Behavioral Psychology
- Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology
- Gender Psychology
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
- Industrial and Organisational Psychology
- Psychology not elsewhere classified