Data_Sheet_1_Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.PDF (308.58 kB)
Download file

Data_Sheet_1_Measurement Properties of the Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale: A Systematic Review.PDF

Download (308.58 kB)
dataset
posted on 28.04.2022, 04:19 by Tonje Lossius Husum, Torleif Ruud, Jakub Lickiewicz, Johan Siqveland
Objective

The Staff Attitude to Coercion Scale (SACS) was developed to assess mental health care staff's attitudes to the use of coercion in treatment. The staff's attitudes to the use of coercion may also influence their willingness to engage in professional development projects aimed at reducing use of coercion. This study systematically reviews the existing evidence related to the measurement properties of the SACS in papers published since the publication of SACS in 2008.

Methods

Seven databases were searched for studies published until October 2021 assessing the measurement properties of SACS or using SACS. All original studies reporting data relevant for the assessment of measurement properties of the SACS were eligible for inclusion. The methodological quality of the studies was assessed and rated using the COnsensus-based Standard for the selection of health Measurement INstruments (COSMIN).

Results

Of the 81 identified publications, 13 studies with a total of 2,675 respondents met the inclusion criteria. Most studies reported data on structural validity and internal consistency, with high methodological quality, but there were almost no data on any other measurement properties.

Conclusion

We found evidence for adequate structural validity and internal consistency of the SACS, while other important measurement properties were not addressed in any of the reviewed studies. Caution is needed when interpreting results of the SACS in terms of aspects such as reliability, criterion validity and measurement error. The relationship between staff attitudes to coercion and the actual use of coercion also remains unclear and needs to be further investigated.

Systematic Review Registration

https://www.crd.york.ac.uk/prospero/, identifier: CRD42021239284.

History

References