Data_Sheet_1_Comparison of CRISPR/Cas Endonucleases for in vivo Retinal Gene Editing.docx
CRISPR/Cas has opened the prospect of direct gene correction therapy for some inherited retinal diseases. Previous work has demonstrated the utility of adeno-associated virus (AAV) mediated delivery to retinal cells in vivo; however, with the expanding repertoire of CRISPR/Cas endonucleases, it is not clear which of these are most efficacious for retinal editing in vivo. We sought to compare CRISPR/Cas endonuclease activity using both single and dual AAV delivery strategies for gene editing in retinal cells. Plasmids of a dual vector system with SpCas9, SaCas9, Cas12a, CjCas9 and a sgRNA targeting YFP, as well as a single vector system with SaCas9/YFP sgRNA were generated and validated in YFP-expressing HEK293A cell by flow cytometry and the T7E1 assay. Paired CRISPR/Cas endonuclease and its best performing sgRNA was then packaged into an AAV2 capsid derivative, AAV7m8, and injected intravitreally into CMV-Cre:Rosa26-YFP mice. SpCas9 and Cas12a achieved better knockout efficiency than SaCas9 and CjCas9. Moreover, no significant difference in YFP gene editing was found between single and dual CRISPR/SaCas9 vector systems. With a marked reduction of YFP-positive retinal cells, AAV7m8 delivered SpCas9 was found to have the highest knockout efficacy among all investigated endonucleases. We demonstrate that the AAV7m8-mediated delivery of CRISPR/SpCas9 construct achieves the most efficient gene modification in neurosensory retinal cells in vivo.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1038/mt.2015.220
- https://doi.org//10.1126/scitranslmed.3005708
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4939-7522-8_9
- https://doi.org//10.1167/iovs.16-19316
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.1706193114
- https://doi.org//10.1161/atvbaha.118.311221
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1225829
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymthe.2018.10.009
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.26031
- https://doi.org//10.1038/mtna.2016.92
- https://doi.org//10.1089/hum.2019.021
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1232033
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nature14299
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymthe.2016.12.006
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nbt.3055
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ophtha.2018.04.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.exer.2018.06.026
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymthe.2019.05.001