Data_Sheet_1_Affective Face Processing Modified by Different Tastes.xlsx
Facial emotional recognition is something used often in our daily lives. How does the brain process the face search? Can taste modify such a process? This study employed two tastes (sweet and acidic) to investigate the cross-modal interaction between taste and emotional face recognition. The behavior responses (reaction time and correct response ratios) and the event-related potential (ERP) were applied to analyze the interaction between taste and face processing. Behavior data showed that when detecting a negative target face with a positive face as a distractor, the participants perform the task faster with an acidic taste than with sweet. No interaction effect was observed with correct response ratio analysis. The early (P1, N170) and mid-stage [early posterior negativity (EPN)] components have shown that sweet and acidic tastes modified the ERP components with the affective face search process in the ERP results. No interaction effect was observed in the late-stage (LPP) component. Our data have extended the understanding of the cross-modal mechanism and provided electrophysiological evidence that affective facial processing could be influenced by sweet and acidic tastes.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1080/13576500802362927
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcatb.2005.02.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0013-4694(82)90010-4
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0956797612438559
- https://doi.org//10.1080/026999300378824
- https://doi.org//10.3758/bf03193146
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.073
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.actpsy.2011.02.004
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1754073912451331
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.10.005
- https://doi.org//10.1080/17470919.2011.581539
- https://doi.org//10.1111/1469-8986.3820175
- https://doi.org//10.1523/jneurosci.2833-11.2011
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.09.018
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0507650102
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroimage.2010.10.047
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2007.11.006
- https://doi.org//10.1093/chemse/bjh245
- https://doi.org//10.1097/00001756-200004270-00036
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2012.02.002
- https://doi.org//10.1093/cercor/bhj066
- https://doi.org//10.1093/chemse/bjx018
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cortex.2020.06.010
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0079-6123(06)56002-9
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1469-8986.2004.00174.x
- https://doi.org//10.1093/scan/nsz027
- https://doi.org//10.1521/soco.2013.31.2.125
- https://doi.org//10.1503/jpn.090094
- https://doi.org//10.1177/1745691617708630
- https://doi.org//10.1037/1528-3542.7.3.487
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biopsycho.2015.07.008
- https://doi.org//10.3724/sp.J.1042.2014.01556
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroscience.2011.09.067
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.neuroscience.2014.01.002
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fnint.2012.00100
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1467-9280.2009.02263.x
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Psychology and Cognitive Sciences not elsewhere classified
- Applied Psychology
- Clinical Psychology
- Developmental and Educational Psychology
- Neuroscience and Physiological Psychology
- Organizational Behavioral Psychology
- Personality, Social and Criminal Psychology
- Gender Psychology
- Health, Clinical and Counselling Psychology
- Industrial and Organisational Psychology
- Psychology not elsewhere classified
CC BY 4.0