DataSheet_1_Neutrophils From Patients With Invasive Candidiasis Are Inhibited by Candida albicans Biofilms.pdf
Invasive candidiasis frequently involves medical device placement. On the surfaces of these devices, Candida can form biofilms and proliferate in adherent layers of fungal cells surrounded by a protective extracellular matrix. Due in part to this extracellular matrix, biofilms resist host defenses and antifungal drugs. Previous work (using neutrophils from healthy donors) found that one mechanism employed to resist host defenses involves the inhibition of neutrophil extracellular traps (NET) formation. NETs contain nuclear DNA, as well as antimicrobial proteins that can ensnare pathogens too large or aggregated to be effectively killed by phagocytosis. Given that these neutrophil structures are anticipated to have activity against the large aggregates of C. albicans biofilms, understanding the role of this inhibition in patients could provide insight into new treatment strategies. However, prior work has not included patients. Here, we examine NET formation by neutrophils collected from patients with invasive candidiasis. When compared to neutrophils from healthy participants, we show that patient neutrophils exhibit a heightened background level of NET release and respond to a positive stimulus by producing 100% more NETs. However, despite these physiologic differences, patient neutrophil responses to C. albicans were similar to healthy neutrophils. For both groups, planktonic cells induce strong NET release and biofilms inhibit NET formation. These results show that a mechanism of immune evasion for fungal biofilms translates to the clinical setting.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1128/cmr.00029-06
- https://doi.org//10.1099/00222615-47-3-253
- https://doi.org//10.1086/322972
- https://doi.org//10.1128/CMR.17.2.255-267.2004
- https://doi.org//10.1146/annurev.micro.59.030804.121034
- https://doi.org//10.1086/652783
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jac/dkq466
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cyto.2011.05.007
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jac/dkf049
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.183.18.5385-5394.2001
- https://doi.org//10.1093/cid/cis021
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2141.2005.05397.x
- https://doi.org//10.7326/0003-4819-89-1-91
- https://doi.org//10.1034/j.1601-0825.2002.00015.x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrmicro.2015.21
- https://doi.org//10.1093/cid/civ933
- https://doi.org//10.1093/infdis/jis607
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.ppat.1005884
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1462-5822.2005.00659.x
- https://doi.org//10.1038/ni.2987
- https://doi.org//10.1126/science.1092385
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.ppat.1000639
- https://doi.org//10.3390/jof3030049
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-017-13588-6
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nri3399
- https://doi.org//10.1189/jlb.1209793
- https://doi.org//10.1098/rsob.120134
- https://doi.org//10.3791/1724
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1202671
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.celrep.2014.06.044
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.ppat.1008096
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.200606027
- https://doi.org//10.1083/jcb.200806072
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nri.2017.105
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nchembio.496
- https://doi.org//10.1002/cyto.a.21178
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2016.00484
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2018.02854
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.intimp.2010.08.012
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nri3024
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0885066618767835
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity