DataSheet_1_Co-Administration of Anticancer Candidate MK-2206 Enhances the Efficacy of BCG Vaccine Against Mycobacterium tuberculosis in Mice and Guinea Pigs.docx
The failure of M. bovis BCG to induce long-term protection has been endowed to its inability to escape the phagolysosome, leading to mild activation of CD8+ mediated T cell response. Induction of apoptosis in host cells plays an important role in potentiating dendritic cells-mediated priming of CD8+ T cells, a process defined as “cross-priming.” Moreover, IL-10 secretion by infected cells has been reported to hamper BCG-induced immunity against Tuberculosis (TB). Previously, we have reported that apoptosis of BCG-infected macrophages and inhibition of IL-10 secretion is FOXO3 dependent, a transcription factor negatively regulated by the pro-survival activated threonine kinase, Akt. We speculate that FOXO3-mediated induction of apoptosis and abrogation of IL-10 secretion along with M. bovis BCG immunization might enhance the protection imparted by BCG. Here, we have assessed whether co-administration of a known anti-cancer Akt inhibitor, MK-2206, enhances the protective efficacy of M. bovis BCG in mice model of infection. We observed that in vitro MK-2206 treatment resulted in FOXO3 activation, enhanced BCG-induced apoptosis of macrophages and inhibition of IL-10 secretion. Co-administration of M. bovis BCG along with MK-2206 also increased apoptosis of antigen-presenting cells in draining lymph nodes of immunized mice. Further, MK-2206 administration improved BCG-induced CD4+ and CD8+ effector T cells responses and its ability to induce both effector and central memory T cells. Finally, we show that co-administration of MK-2206 enhanced the protection imparted by M. bovis BCG against Mtb in aerosol infected mice and guinea pigs. Taken together, we provide evidence that MK-2206-mediated activation of FOXO3 potentiates BCG-induced immunity and imparts protection against Mtb through enhanced innate immune response.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2017.01134
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cell.2020.02.024
- https://doi.org//10.3310/hta21390
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fmicb.2019.03154
- https://doi.org//10.1111/sji.12772
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2020.00316
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41577-019-0174-z
- https://doi.org//10.1586/14760584.6.3.441
- https://doi.org//10.1101/cshperspect.a018465
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cellimm.2013.11.007
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.0801694
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41541-019-0122-8
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2017.00407
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nm906
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.immuni.2005.12.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.10.031
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0015857
- https://doi.org//10.1128/mBio.00679-16
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.vaccine.2007.12.056
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molimm.2015.04.003
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.175.8.5324
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.180.9.5771
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.173.7.4590
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2019/8616154
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cellimm.2008.03.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cellsig.2014.01.015
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2567.2009.03062.x
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2017.01755
- https://doi.org//10.1038/mi.2011.7
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1201061
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2019.02922
- https://doi.org//10.1111/cmi.12298
- https://doi.org//10.1128/iai.64.7.2673-2679.1996
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1471-2407-14-145
- https://doi.org//10.2147/DDDT.S67961
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijpharm.2006.06.014
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acsomega.0c01228
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00038-13
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2019.01.091
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep25837
- https://doi.org//10.1182/blood-2005-03-1281
- https://doi.org//10.1111/imm.12731
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.179.4.2509
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1701109
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-4614-6111-1_8
- https://doi.org//10.1038/cmi.2017.113
- https://doi.org//10.1128/CVI.00368-09
- https://doi.org//10.1182/blood-2009-06-227546
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12967-017-1301-x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00281-020-00794-0
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-019-44294-0
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2019.01317
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.micinf.2008.08.010
- https://doi.org//10.1101/cshperspect.a018572
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00038-13
- https://doi.org//10.1172/JCI128877
- https://doi.org//10.1038/cddis.2015.403
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12964-016-0152-z
- https://doi.org//10.1089/107999099313695
- https://doi.org//10.1128/IAI.70.12.6672-6679.2002
- https://doi.org//10.1152/ajplung.00319.2013
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.imlet.2010.08.008
- https://doi.org//10.2353/ajpath.2010.100367
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2019.02530
- https://doi.org//10.4161/viru.22586
- https://doi.org//10.1152/ajplung.00162.2017
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1462-5822.2004.00408.x
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2017.01262
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.0801592
- https://doi.org//10.1128/IAI.00024-08
- https://doi.org//10.1172/JCI32933
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fimmu.2018.00121
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymthe.2017.02.018
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.ppat.1000392
- https://doi.org//10.3390/vaccines8020300
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2012/745483
- https://doi.org//10.1084/jem.20050324
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12551-013-0133-z
- https://doi.org//10.4049/jimmunol.1002860
- https://doi.org//10.1186/1743-422X-6-87
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-018-26984-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0264-410X(02)00241-4
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Transplantation Immunology
- Tumour Immunology
- Immunology not elsewhere classified
- Immunology
- Veterinary Immunology
- Animal Immunology
- Genetic Immunology
- Applied Immunology (incl. Antibody Engineering, Xenotransplantation and T-cell Therapies)
- Autoimmunity
- Cellular Immunology
- Humoural Immunology and Immunochemistry
- Immunogenetics (incl. Genetic Immunology)
- Innate Immunity