DataSheet1_Enhanced 3-Hydroxypropionic Acid Production From Acetate via the Malonyl-CoA Pathway in Corynebacterium glutamicum.docx
Acetate is an economical and environmental-friendly alternative carbon source. Herein, the potential of harnessing Corynebacterium glutamicum as a host to produce 3-hydroxypropionic acid (3-HP) from acetate was explored. First, the expression level of malonyl-CoA reductase from Chloroflexus aurantiacus was optimized through several strategies, strain Cgz2/sod-N-C* showed an MCR enzyme activity of 63 nmol/mg/min and a 3-HP titer of 0.66 g/L in flasks. Next, the expression of citrate synthase in Cgz2/sod-N-C* was weakened to reduce the acetyl-CoA consumption in the TCA cycle, and the resulting strain Cgz12/sod-N-C* produced 2.39 g/L 3-HP from 9.32 g/L acetate. However, the subsequent deregulation of the expression of acetyl-CoA carboxylase genes in Cgz12/sod-N-C* resulted in an increased accumulation of intracellular fatty acids, instead of 3-HP. Accordingly, cerulenin was used to inhibit fatty acid synthesis in Cgz14/sod-N-C*, and its 3-HP titer was further increased to 4.26 g/L, with a yield of 0.50 g 3-HP/g-acetate. Finally, the engineered strain accumulated 17.1 g/L 3-HP in a bioreactor without cerulenin addition, representing the highest titer achieved using acetate as substrate. The results demonstrated that Corynebacterium glutamicum is a promising host for 3-HP production from acetate.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.copbio.2011.11.012
- https://doi.org//10.1039/b922014c
- https://doi.org//10.3390/catal10020203
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2014.01.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2016.11.009
- https://doi.org//10.1099/13500872-140-8-1817
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-018-07412-6
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.00254-07
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-011-3686-4
- https://doi.org//10.1128/Jb.184.9.2404-2410.2002
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-021-21632-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/S0168-1656%2803%2900148-2
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biotechadv.2013.02.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.synbio.2021.06.003
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124362
- https://doi.org//10.3390/catal8110525
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0075554
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2016.01.001
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2018.10.003
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12934-020-01363-8
- https://doi.org//10.1039/c7gc02753b
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s13068-018-1094-z
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12934-019-1117-x
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1365-2958.2010.07337.x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s13205-018-1456-z
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.26508
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.22429
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.phytochem.2004.06.035
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s002030050497
- https://doi.org//10.1128/JB.182.11.3088-3096.2000
- https://doi.org//10.2172/926125
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.24954
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10529-018-2539-y
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-019-09772-5
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0060659
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10529-013-1376-2
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Agricultural Marine Biotechnology
- Biomaterials
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Biotechnology
- Biomarkers
- Biomedical Engineering not elsewhere classified
- Synthetic Biology
- Bioremediation
- Bioprocessing, Bioproduction and Bioproducts
- Industrial Biotechnology Diagnostics (incl. Biosensors)
- Industrial Microbiology (incl. Biofeedstocks)
- Industrial Molecular Engineering of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- Industrial Biotechnology not elsewhere classified
- Medical Biotechnology Diagnostics (incl. Biosensors)
- Biological Engineering
- Medical Molecular Engineering of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- Regenerative Medicine (incl. Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering)
- Medical Biotechnology not elsewhere classified
- Genetic Engineering