DataSheet1_Coproduction of 5-Aminovalerate and δ-Valerolactam for the Synthesis of Nylon 5 From L-Lysine in Escherichia coli.docx
The compounds 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam are important building blocks that can be used to synthesize bioplastics. The production of 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam in microorganisms provides an ideal source that reduces the cost. To achieve efficient biobased coproduction of 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam in Escherichia coli, a single biotransformation step from L-lysine was constructed. First, an equilibrium mixture was formed by L-lysine α-oxidase RaiP from Scomber japonicus. In addition, by adjusting the pH and H2O2 concentration, the titers of 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam reached 10.24 and 1.82 g/L from 40 g/L L-lysine HCl at pH 5.0 and 10 mM H2O2, respectively. With the optimized pH value, the δ-valerolactam titer was improved to 6.88 g/L at pH 9.0 with a molar yield of 0.35 mol/mol lysine. The ratio of 5AVA and δ-valerolactam was obviously affected by pH value. The ratio of 5AVA and δ-valerolactam could be obtained in the range of 5.63:1–0.58:1 at pH 5.0–9.0 from the equilibrium mixture. As a result, the simultaneous synthesis of 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam from L-lysine in Escherichia coli is highly promising. To our knowledge, this result constitutes the highest δ-valerolactam titer reported by biological methods. In summary, a commercially implied bioprocess developed for the coproduction of 5-aminovalerate and δ-valerolactam using engineered Escherichia coli.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1002/bit.24828
- https://doi.org//10.3390/microorganisms9020462
- https://doi.org//10.3390/biom10010109
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2017.04.001
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41598-020-57752-x
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10295-018-2044-2
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-021-11153-w
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2021.633028
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jctb.5708
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.0c00346
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biotechadv.2020.107587
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2021.627082
- https://doi.org//10.3390/catal10091065
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2017.05.131
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2017.04.108
- https://doi.org//10.1002/chem.200801696
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110739
- https://doi.org//10.1128/aac.01103-08
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2020.124235
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssuschemeng.9b05484
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2017.07.007
- https://doi.org//10.1038/srep30884
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acs.chemrev.7b00074
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10529-017-2314-5
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cej.2020.126829
- https://doi.org//10.3390/biom11030402
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrmicro2990
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ijbiomac.2020.12.017
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2012.11.011
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2020.630476
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcatb.2009.12.006
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00289-019-02718-x
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12934-016-0553-0
- https://doi.org//10.1002/mbo3.1160
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biortech.2020.122844
- https://doi.org//10.3389/fbioe.2021.635509
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.nbt.2020.11.012
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.indcrop.2020.112809
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s12934-016-0566-8
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41580-020-0230-3
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s13068-021-01878-1
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.9b00292
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s43393-020-00021-9
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.5b00129
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.foodchem.2020.126699
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41467-020-18833-7
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-020-10992-3
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.molcatb.2016.10.008
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ymben.2019.03.008
- https://doi.org//10.1038/s41586-020-2032-3
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00253-020-10939-8
- https://doi.org//10.1039/d0gc03100c
- https://doi.org//10.1039/d1gc01120k
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.mcat.2019.110713
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.6b00136
- https://doi.org//10.1021/acssynbio.6b00372
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.meteno.2015.11.001
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s43393-021-00031-1
- https://doi.org//10.1073/pnas.0905396106
- https://doi.org//10.1128/AEM.00814-18
Usage metrics
Read the peer-reviewed publication
Categories
- Agricultural Marine Biotechnology
- Biomaterials
- Biomechanical Engineering
- Biotechnology
- Biomarkers
- Biomedical Engineering not elsewhere classified
- Synthetic Biology
- Bioremediation
- Bioprocessing, Bioproduction and Bioproducts
- Industrial Biotechnology Diagnostics (incl. Biosensors)
- Industrial Microbiology (incl. Biofeedstocks)
- Industrial Molecular Engineering of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- Industrial Biotechnology not elsewhere classified
- Medical Biotechnology Diagnostics (incl. Biosensors)
- Biological Engineering
- Medical Molecular Engineering of Nucleic Acids and Proteins
- Regenerative Medicine (incl. Stem Cells and Tissue Engineering)
- Medical Biotechnology not elsewhere classified
- Genetic Engineering