DataSheet1_β-Ecdysterone Enhanced Bone Regeneration Through the BMP-2/SMAD/RUNX2/Osterix Signaling Pathway.docx
Bone defects are a global public health problem. However, the available methods for inducing bone regeneration are limited. The application of traditional Chinese herbs for bone regeneration has gained popularity in recent years. β-ecdysterone is a plant sterol similar to estrogen, that promotes protein synthesis in cells; however, its function in bone regeneration remains unclear. In this study, we investigated the function of β-ecdysterone on osteoblast differentiation and bone regeneration in vitro and in vivo. MC3T3-E1 cells were used to test the function of β-ecdysterone on osteoblast differentiation and bone regeneration in vitro. The results of the Cell Counting Kit-8 assay suggested that the proliferation of MC3T3-E1 cells was promoted by β-ecdysterone. Furthermore, β-ecdysterone influenced the expression of osteogenesis-related genes, and the bone regeneration capacity of MC3T3-E1 cells was detected by polymerase chain reaction, the alkaline phosphatase (ALP) test, and the alizarin red test. β-ecdysterone could upregulate the expression of osteoblastic-related genes, and promoted ALP activity and the formation of calcium nodules. We also determined that β-ecdysterone increased the mRNA and protein levels of components of the BMP-2/Smad/Runx2/Osterix pathway. DNA sequencing further confirmed these target effects. β-ecdysterone promoted bone formation by enhancing gene expression of the BMP-2/Smad/Runx2/Osterix signaling pathway and by enrichment biological processes. For in vivo experiments, a femoral condyle defect model was constructed by drilling a bone defect measuring 3 mm in diameter and 4 mm in depth in the femoral condyle of 8-week-old Sprague Dawley male rats. This model was used to further assess the bone regenerative functions of β-ecdysterone. The results of micro-computed tomography showed that β-ecdysterone could accelerate bone regeneration, exhibiting higher bone volume, bone surface, and bone mineral density at each observation time point. Immunohistochemistry confirmed that the β-ecdysterone also increased the expression of collagen, osteocalcin, and bone morphogenetic protein-2 in the experiment group at 4 and 8 weeks. In conclusion, β-ecdysterone is a new bone regeneration regulator that can stimulate MC3T3-E1 cell proliferation and induce bone regeneration through the BMP-2/Smad/Runx2/Osterix pathway. This newly discovered function of β-ecdysterone has revealed a new direction of osteogenic differentiation and has provided novel therapeutic strategies for treating bone defects.
History
References
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2004.11.059
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jaim.2017.04.003
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2020.11764
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11010-011-0938-7
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejmp.2021.07.005
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.cytogfr.2009.10.002
- https://doi.org//10.1055/s-0043-107808
- https://doi.org//10.26355/eurrev_202001_19943
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jor.22238
- https://doi.org//10.1001/archotol.126.9.1124
- https://doi.org//10.1248/bpb.31.2245
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.injury.2014.04.002
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0006-2952%2802%2901585-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.ejphar.2012.07.044
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dvdy.240
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s10103-017-2426-0
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bbrc.2017.12.079
- https://doi.org//10.1007/978-1-0716-0989-7_12
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.jconrel.2010.02.016
- https://doi.org//10.3892/ijmm.2017.3280
- https://doi.org//10.1089/ten.teb.2012.0527
- https://doi.org//10.1038/nrm3254
- https://doi.org//10.1242/dmm.033084
- https://doi.org//10.1093/jb/mvp148
- https://doi.org//10.1155/2018/4178021
- https://doi.org//10.1002/jcb.10744
- https://doi.org//10.1002/dvdy.23992
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.injury.2005.07.027
- https://doi.org//10.1359/jbmr.060109
- https://doi.org//10.1074/jbc.m500646200
- https://doi.org//10.4252/wjsc.v8.i1.1
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.semcdb.2008.07.004
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00134-012-2576-2
- https://doi.org//10.1371/journal.pone.0016078
- https://doi.org//10.1096/fj.201801241r
- https://doi.org//10.1016/s0894-1130%2898%2980008-2
- https://doi.org//10.1196/annals.1327.094
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12079-013-0204-8
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2017.7840
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2017.8053
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.phymed.2008.04.015
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.bone.2021.116002
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s11999-009-1068-3
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s00264-013-2059-2
- https://doi.org//10.1177/0022034512448660
- https://doi.org//10.3892/mmr.2019.9861
- https://doi.org//10.1089/scd.2008.0113
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.biomaterials.2018.10.033
- https://doi.org//10.1186/s13287-019-1168-2
- https://doi.org//10.1007/s12011-011-9094-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/0006-2952%2871%2990431-x
- https://doi.org//10.1016/j.stem.2018.09.001
- https://doi.org//10.1111/j.1349-7006.2010.01515.x
- https://doi.org//10.1002/ddr.21170
- https://doi.org//10.7150/thno.36930
- https://doi.org//10.2217/pgs.14.12
- https://doi.org//10.1093/toxsci/kfv111